chore: replace busboy with @fastify/busboy

[rtritto]

@fastify/busboy is a better version of busboy for performance, maintenance and some solved critical bug.

Related: fastify/busboy#68

[coveralls]

coverage: 94.785%. remained the same when pulling 5d07c5c on rtritto:replace-fastify into fcb6952 on richardgirges:master.

[rtritto]

@fastify/busboy forked branch isn't currently alligned with busboy branch: fastify/busboy#78.
I think we should wait to merge this.

[rtritto]

@RomanBurunkov @RobinTail any update to merge this PR?

[RobinTail]

It may appear that way, but I'm not the one who decides for this repo, @rtritto :)

You also said

I think we should wait to merge this.

So, should we? Please let the maintainer know.

[rtritto]

It's active and maintained by team of undici

[RobinTail]

@RomanBurunkov || @richardgirges , please take a look on this.

[RomanBurunkov]

Hi @rtritto , do not see any reasons to switch from original busboy to the fork.

Could you please provide some additional details, use cases, etc.

[rtritto]

@fastify/busboy advantages:

• speed
• 0 dependencies (use Node.js api like node:events, node:stream and node:util)
• less opened issues
• more contributors (same team of undici package)
• frequently updated

Sources:

• https://github.com/mscdex/busboy
• https://github.com/fastify/busboy
• https://npmtrends.com/@fastify/busboy-vs-busboy
• https://bundlephobia.com/package/[email protected]
• https://bundlephobia.com/package/@fastify/[email protected]