Skip to content

[WIP] Understanding Dependencies in Hatch Configuration #488

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

Copilot
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI commented Aug 5, 2025

Coding agent has begun work on Understanding Dependencies in Hatch Configuration and will replace this description as work progresses.

See problem context

TITLE: Understanding Dependencies in Hatch Configuration

USER INTENT: The user seeks clarification on the differences between extra-dependencies and dependencies in Hatch configuration.

TASK DESCRIPTION: The user is trying to understand how to properly categorize dependencies in a Hatch project, specifically the distinction between mandatory and optional dependencies.

EXISTING: The assistant provided an initial explanation of the two types of dependencies in Hatch, outlining their purposes and typical usage scenarios.

PENDING: The user requested further verification of the assistant's explanation by consulting the official documentation to ensure accuracy.

CODE STATE: No specific code files were discussed or modified in this conversation.

RELEVANT CODE/DOCUMENTATION SNIPPETS:

  • Dependencies:
    • dependencies: Core runtime dependencies required for the project to function.
    • extra-dependencies: Optional dependencies for testing, linting, CI jobs, or special features.

OTHER NOTES: The user expressed doubt about the assistant's initial explanation and requested a check against the official documentation, indicating a need for accurate and reliable information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants