Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

handful of TF tools #66

Open
jbohren opened this issue May 20, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

handful of TF tools #66

jbohren opened this issue May 20, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@jbohren
Copy link
Member

jbohren commented May 20, 2014

I've been maintaining a handful of TF tools over in https://github.com/jhu-lcsr/lcsr_tf_tools

Of these, two of them could be useful in general to the larger community:

  • interactive_transform_publisher Publishes a TF frame based in an interactive marker
  • twist_frame_integrator Publishes a TF frame based on the integration of a geometry_msgs/Twist message

Any interest in merging these two into geometry_experimental?

@tfoote
Copy link
Member

tfoote commented May 20, 2014

The interactive_tansform_publisher definitely is generally of interest. I'd want to review it's dependencies to make sure it's not too heavy weight. But i think it could be merged into tf2_tools after a review.

The twist integrator seems like it would be better released as a library. Running it as script is hard to do things like reset the integration etc. Also the multiplier parameters seem odd for an integrator. There are also potentially several ways to do the discrete integration which might want to be expose and I'm not sure making this script highly generic is worth the effort.

@davetcoleman
Copy link

+1 to the interactive transform publisher, i've been wanting this for a long time!! @mcevoyandy and I made a similar keyboard-based tf publisher that you can tweak by keyboard which we would also be interested in contributing to tf2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants