DOC: Add note on naming convention inconsistencies (backport #5918) #5943
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request: Clarify Naming Convention Deviations in ROS 2 C++ Style Guide
What was fixed?
snake_case
,PascalCase
, andUPPER_CASE
for constants and variables, which deviates from the Google C++ Style Guide (which recommendskPascalCase
for constants).Why was this needed?
Where was it fixed?
source/The-ROS2-Project/Contributing/Code-Style-Language-Versions.rst
under the C++ > Variable Naming section.
Example of the new notice:
This change improves clarity for all contributors and reviewers working on ROS 2 C++ code.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #5918 done by Mergify.