Skip to content

Do not free disk space in the mingw-check-tidy job #142199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2025

Conversation

Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Jun 8, 2025

It's not needed an it slows down the job considerably. It took ~2 minutes out of the total 8-9 minutes of running mingw-check-tidy.

It's not needed an it slows down the job considerably.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Beránek <[email protected]>
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 8, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 8, 2025
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Does tidy have any interactions with submodules that we should keep? I guess tidy still runs in full CI regardless, right, so this can't cause correctness issues?

r=me

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kobzol commented Jun 8, 2025

I don't think we do, or at least not with all the checks that run on PR CI, these include extra checks. I'm testing now whether the submodule checkout is needed. We exclude submodules for tidy checks anyway.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kobzol commented Jun 8, 2025

Hmm, the submodule thing will have to be a bit more complicated, let's land this in parts, avoiding the disk space freeing is already an improvement.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kobzol commented Jun 8, 2025

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 8, 2025

📌 Commit b189d29 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 8, 2025
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2025
…acrum

Do not free disk space in the `mingw-check-tidy` job

It's not needed an it slows down the job considerably. It took ~2 minutes out of the total 8-9 minutes of running `mingw-check-tidy`.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #141803 (Remove rustc's notion of "preferred" alignment AKA `__alignof`)
 - #142053 (Add new Tier-3 targets: `loongarch32-unknown-none*`)
 - #142089 (Replace all uses of sysroot_candidates with get_or_default_sysroot)
 - #142108 (compiler: Add track_caller to AbiMapping::unwrap)
 - #142132 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [6/N])
 - #142162 (UnsafePinned: update get() docs and signature to allow shared mutation)
 - #142171 (`tests/ui`: A New Order [7/N])
 - #142179 (store `target.min_global_align` as an `Align`)
 - #142183 (Added test for 30904)
 - #142194 (Remove all unused feature gates from the compiler)
 - #142199 (Do not free disk space in the `mingw-check-tidy` job)
 - #142210 (Run `mingw-check-tidy` on auto builds)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 66b6da5 into rust-lang:master Jun 9, 2025
12 of 19 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 9, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2025
Rollup merge of #142199 - Kobzol:tidy-speed-up, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Do not free disk space in the `mingw-check-tidy` job

It's not needed an it slows down the job considerably. It took ~2 minutes out of the total 8-9 minutes of running `mingw-check-tidy`.
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the tidy-speed-up branch June 9, 2025 05:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants