Update rubocop-capybara 2.22.1 → 2.23.0 (minor)#1106
Open
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
Open
Update rubocop-capybara 2.22.1 → 2.23.0 (minor)#1106depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
Conversation
depfu
Bot
added
dependencies
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ rubocop-capybara (2.22.1 → 2.23.0) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
2.23.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 30 commits:
Merge pull request #170 from rubocop/v2.23.0v2.23.0Merge pull request #168 from rubocop/fix/167-find-all-first-receiverFix an incorrect autocorrect for `Capybara/FindAllFirst` when `find` or `all` with `match: :first` uses a receiver and mark autocorrection as unsafeMerge pull request #166 from rubocop/ci-test-rspec-4-on-its-main-branchCI: Test RSpec 4 prerelease on rspec main branchMerge pull request #164 from rubocop/haveselectorFix an error for `Capybara/RSpec/HaveSelector` when passing only a selector typeMerge pull request #155 from rubocop/move-rspec-deptSplit `Capybara/MatchStyle` into `Capybara/AssertStyle` and `Capybara/RSpec/MatchStyle`Move the department associated with `Capybara::RSpecMatchers` to `Capybara/RSpec/*`Merge pull request #137 from rubocop/fix-136Merge pull request #162 from rubocop/ci-use-latest-rubyCI: Use latest Ruby where possibleMerge pull request #161 from rubocop/ci-test-ruby-4.0Temporarily add irb to GemfileCI: Test with Ruby 4.0Merge pull request #160 from nzlaura/feat/have-text-copfeat: create cop preferring have_text over have_contentMerge pull request #157 from rubocop/dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-6Bump actions/checkout from 5 to 6Fix an incorrect autocorrect for `Capybara/RedundantWithinFind` when escape required css selectorMerge pull request #156 from rubocop/fix-rubocopFix an offense for `InternalAffairs/NodePatternGroups`Merge pull request #154 from rubocop/dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-5Bump actions/checkout from 4 to 5Merge pull request #153 from rubocop/fix150Fix a false positive for `Capybara/FindAllFirst` when using logical operators with `all('...')[0]`Merge pull request #152 from digitaltom/mainFix rdoc format of link to Capybara docsRelease Notes
2.19.5
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 6 commits:
Release 2.19.5Avoid spamming too many deprecations while parsingTest TruffleRuby release in CI for improved stabilityForce ensure_valid_encoding to be inlined.Use RB_ENC_CODERANGE to first check the cached coderange before calling rb_enc_str_coderange if the coderange is unknown.Fix typo in changelogRelease Notes
2.1.0 (from changelog)
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 9 commits:
v2.1.0Merge pull request #373 from grosser/grosser/hmacprevent pipe injectionMerge pull request #372 from tagliala/chore/remove-regex-matchPrefer `String#include?` and `match?` over `=~`Merge pull request #371 from tagliala/chore/remove-old-specRemove stale Darwin hwprefs specMerge pull request #368 from grosser/grosser/speedspeed up testsDepfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands