-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Changes to Fresh and Separation Checking #24112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 13 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
28eb166
Disallow nested capabilitirs in self types of classes
odersky cd0bc94
SepCheck: Record span capture sets instead of deep capture sets
odersky 8de92b9
SepCheck: Revise definition of peaks
odersky a968863
Refactorings and renamings
odersky 7a7f747
Normalize fresh caps in result types
odersky 403165e
Drop alias detection for HiddenSets
odersky 5e4fed2
Extends "covers" between capability to classified capabilities
odersky d62d3d1
Make footprint also include non-terminal capabilities
odersky cba62c9
Drop old footprint computation
odersky bab1ef7
Make covers work also for FreshCaps
odersky bc93c9e
Drop old footprint and overlap logic.
odersky 77f60a1
Make formalCaptures use the spanCaptureSet
odersky f67c6fb
Add some more doc comments
odersky c492a63
Address review suggestions
odersky File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems dubious. We can derive that
x.only[C] covers x
. Couldn't we pick aC
that would excludex
? Maybe it's fine in the usage contexts ofcovers
? What's the expected interaction ofcovers
and substitution of capture sets?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This clause is a conservative over-approximation: basically, we can't achieve
separation by having different classifiers for now. I would be good to
have a test that would expect such separation, then we can try to refine
the clause to make the test pass.