Skip to content

semantica-agi/semantica

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

1,997 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Semantica

The Context and Accountability Layer for AI Agents

Semantica is the Context and Accountability Layer for AI agents: context graphs, decision intelligence, explainable reasoning, and policy governance, with a permanent audit trail behind every decision.

It's the intelligence category Palantir built for the enterprise, delivered 100% open source and self-hostable, with zero black boxes and zero vendor lock-in, from startup to Fortune 500, without the seven-figure contract.

Decision Intelligence  ·  Context Management  ·  Deterministic Reasoning  ·  Traceability

Open Source  ·  Auditable  ·  Governed  ·  Self-Hostable

Polyglot Graph Storage

GitHub Stars PyPI Total Downloads Python 3.8+ License: MIT CI Ask DeepWiki

Website Docs Discord Twitter/X YouTube Changelog


Most AI agents act without a trail. They store embeddings, not meaning: context that can't be explained, decisions that can't be audited. Regulators, auditors, and enterprise risk teams all ask the same question: can you prove what your AI did and why?

Semantica answers that question. It sits alongside your LLM, vector store, and agent framework as a dedicated context and accountability layer, adding structured intelligence, causal reasoning, and a full audit trail to every decision your agents make. Built for teams running AI agents in production, especially in healthcare, finance, legal, and government, where every decision must be explainable and defensible.

What Semantica gives you:

  • Context Graphs: A structured, queryable graph of everything your agent knows, decides, and reasons about
  • Decision Intelligence: Every decision is a first-class object: traceable, searchable by precedent, and causally linked
  • AI Governance & Ontology: SHACL constraints, conflict detection, compliance rules, OWL generation, and SKOS vocabulary management with a visual editor
  • Full Auditability: W3C PROV-O provenance on every fact, with audit trails exportable to JSON, CSV, or RDF
  • Deterministic Reasoning: Forward chaining, Rete network, Datalog, and SPARQL with fully explainable paths, not black boxes
  • Knowledge Pipeline: Multi-source ingestion, entity-aware chunking, and semantic deduplication with provenance-preserving merges
  • Polyglot Graph Storage: Native support for both RDF (Blazegraph, Apache Jena, Eclipse RDF4J via SPARQL) and Labeled Property Graphs (Neo4j, FalkorDB, Apache AGE, AWS Neptune via Cypher), plus vector stores, all swappable without touching your code
  • Flexible Storage & Visualization: Swap storage backends freely; explore it all in an interactive browser workbench
  • Drop-in Integrations: Native Agno support, a full-featured MCP server, a comprehensive CLI, a REST API, and plugins across major editors

Quick Start  ·  Architecture  ·  Why Semantica  ·  Context Graphs  ·  Decision Intelligence  ·  Module Reference  ·  Recipes  ·  CLI  ·  Integrations  ·  Performance  ·  Install


See It in Action

Semantica Knowledge Explorer: live graph, decisions, entity resolution, ontology hub

Semantica: Full Platform Walkthrough on YouTube

Watch the full platform walkthrough →

Knowledge Explorer · Context Graphs · Reasoning Engine · Decision Intelligence · Ontology Hub


Quick Start

pip install semantica
from semantica.context import ContextGraph

graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)

# Every agent decision becomes a queryable, auditable knowledge node
decision_id = graph.record_decision(
    category="vendor_selection",
    scenario="Choose cloud provider for HIPAA workload",
    reasoning="AWS offers BAA, mature HIPAA tooling, and existing team expertise",
    outcome="selected_aws",
    confidence=0.93,
)

# Ask "why did this happen?" and get a real, structured answer
chain     = graph.trace_decision_chain(decision_id)       # full causal ancestry
similar   = graph.find_similar_decisions("cloud vendor", max_results=5)  # precedents
impact    = graph.analyze_decision_impact(decision_id)    # downstream influence map
compliant = graph.check_decision_rules({"category": "vendor_selection"})  # policy gate

Verify your install in 5 seconds:

semantica doctor
# Python 3.11.9         pass
# semantica 0.5.1       pass
# faiss vector store    pass
# Config file           pass    ~/.semantica/config.yaml

If Semantica solves a real problem for you, a star helps others find it.

⭐ Star on GitHub  ·  Join Discord


Architecture

The full data pipeline and decision intelligence lifecycle are documented with Mermaid flowcharts in ARCHITECTURE.md:

View architecture →

Every component is independently importable. Use one module or all of them.


Why Semantica

Vector DB + RAG Plain LLM Memory Semantica
Recall method Embedding similarity Token window Graph traversal + semantic search
Decision history Not stored Not stored First-class queryable objects
Provenance None None W3C PROV-O, source-linked
Reasoning None Black box Forward chain, Rete, Datalog, SPARQL
Conflict detection Silent overwrite Silent overwrite Detected, flagged, resolved
Time travel No No Point-in-time graph snapshots
Compliance export None None PROV-O, SHACL, OWL, RDF
Policy enforcement None None Built-in rule engine + SHACL
Entity resolution No No Blocking + semantic deduplication
Multi-agent context Separate per agent Separate per agent Single shared intelligence layer

Semantica complements your existing stack rather than replacing it. Keep your LLM, vector store, and agent framework exactly as they are. Semantica sits alongside them as the accountability and intelligence layer, adding structured decision records, causal reasoning, W3C PROV-O provenance, ontology governance, conflict detection, and compliance-grade audit trails. The reasoning engines, KG construction, and provenance layer are fully deterministic; no LLM is required to use them.


Context Graphs

A Context Graph is the structured memory layer that traditional RAG is missing. Instead of flat embeddings that answer "what is similar?", a Context Graph answers "what is connected, why, and how?"

Every entity, relationship, decision, and fact is a first-class node, queryable by graph traversal and neighbor expansion. Entities link to source documents. Decisions link to evidence and consequences. Facts carry full provenance. Conflicts are detected, not silently overwritten.

from semantica.context import ContextGraph, AgentContext
from semantica.vector_store import VectorStore

graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)

# Add nodes with typed properties
graph.add_node("acme_corp",    "Organization", name="Acme Corp", industry="SaaS")
graph.add_node("alice_chen",   "Person",       name="Alice Chen", role="CTO")
graph.add_node("contract_001", "Contract",     value=2_400_000, currency="USD")

# Add typed, weighted edges (extra kwargs become edge metadata)
graph.add_edge("alice_chen", "acme_corp",    edge_type="works_for",  since="2019-03-01")
graph.add_edge("acme_corp",  "contract_001", edge_type="party_to",   signed="2024-01-15")

# BFS traversal - hop through the graph from any node
neighbors = graph.get_neighbors("acme_corp", hops=2)

# Point-in-time snapshot - the graph as it existed on any past date
snapshot  = graph.state_at("2024-01-01")

# AgentContext - high-level API for agent memory workflows
vs  = VectorStore(backend="faiss")
ctx = AgentContext(vector_store=vs, knowledge_graph=graph)
ctx.store("Alice approved the Acme renewal in Q1 2024", conversation_id="conv_001")
retrieved = ctx.retrieve("who approved the Acme contract?")

Why graph over embeddings:

  • Traversal finds connections embeddings miss, including a person 3 hops from a contract
  • Every node carries provenance so you can always ask "where did this come from?"
  • Conflicts are detected and flagged before they corrupt your knowledge base
  • Point-in-time snapshots let you replay history without reprocessing

Decision Intelligence

Decision Intelligence turns every AI choice from an ephemeral inference into a permanent, auditable, queryable record. It answers "what did your AI decide, why, and what happened next?" The question regulators and enterprise risk teams are asking with increasing urgency.

In Semantica, a decision is not a log line. It is a first-class graph node with a full lifecycle. In regulated domains, every AI decision must be traceable to a source and defensible to an auditor: record_decision() creates a permanent, structured record exportable as W3C PROV-O, the format most compliance frameworks accept for regulator submission.

record_decision()             → stored as a graph node with full structured context
add_causal_relationship()     → linked to upstream causes and downstream effects
find_similar_decisions()      → semantic precedent search across all past decisions
trace_decision_chain()        → full causal ancestry back to root causes
analyze_decision_impact()     → downstream influence map - everything this decision affected
check_decision_rules()        → policy compliance gate against configurable rule sets
export / audit trail          → W3C PROV-O, CSV, or JSON for regulator submission
from semantica.context import ContextGraph

graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)

# Record decisions with full structured context
app_id = graph.record_decision(
    category="credit_application",
    scenario="Personal loan, $85k income, 31% DTI, 3yr employment",
    reasoning="Income meets threshold; employment stable; no adverse credit events",
    outcome="proceed_to_underwriting",
    confidence=0.88,
    metadata={"applicant_id": "A-7291"},
)
uw_id = graph.record_decision(
    category="loan_underwriting",
    scenario="Underwriting review for A-7291",
    reasoning="DTI within policy; clean 36-month credit history",
    outcome="approved",
    confidence=0.94,
)
rate_id = graph.record_decision(
    category="interest_rate",
    scenario="Rate assignment for approved loan A-7291",
    outcome="rate_set_8.9pct",
    reasoning="Prime + 2.4% based on risk tier B2",
    confidence=0.99,
)

# Build the auditable causal chain
graph.add_causal_relationship(app_id, uw_id,   relationship_type="triggers")
graph.add_causal_relationship(uw_id,  rate_id, relationship_type="enables")

# Query the intelligence
chain     = graph.trace_decision_chain(rate_id)
similar   = graph.find_similar_decisions("personal loan approval, 31% DTI", max_results=5)
impact    = graph.analyze_decision_impact(uw_id)
compliant = graph.check_decision_rules({"category": "loan_underwriting", "confidence": 0.94})
insights  = graph.get_decision_insights()

Module Reference

Semantica is a full platform. Every module is independently importable and composable. Below are working examples for each.

semantica.ingest: Multi-Source Ingestion

Ingest from files, web, databases, APIs, streams, email, Git repos, Parquet, Snowflake, or MCP servers, all through a unified interface.

from semantica.ingest import FileIngestor, WebIngestor, ParquetIngestor, DBIngestor

# Ingest an entire directory of contracts (PDF, DOCX, HTML, TXT)
docs = FileIngestor().ingest_directory("./contracts/", recursive=True)

# Ingest live web content with robots.txt compliance
pages = WebIngestor().ingest_url("https://example.com/reports/annual-2024.html")

# Ingest structured data from Parquet with Snappy compression
records = ParquetIngestor().ingest("./data/transactions.parquet")

# Ingest from a SQL database - specify which tables to pull
rows = DBIngestor().ingest_database(
    connection_string="postgresql://user:pass@localhost/mydb",
    include_tables=["customer_events"],
    max_rows_per_table=50_000,
)

Supported sources: Local files (PDF, DOCX, PPTX, HTML, TXT, CSV, JSON, YAML, Excel, XML) · Web pages · RSS/Atom feeds · REST APIs · Databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, Oracle, SQL Server) · Parquet datasets · Snowflake · Git repositories · Email (IMAP/POP3) · Message streams (Kafka, RabbitMQ, Kinesis, Pulsar) · MCP resources


semantica.semantic_extract: NER, Relations, Events, Triplets

Extract structured knowledge from raw text in one pass.

from semantica.semantic_extract import (
    NamedEntityRecognizer,
    RelationExtractor,
    EventDetector,
    TripletExtractor,
)

text = """
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei announced a $7.3B Series E funding round in partnership
with Google and Spark Capital, valuing the company at $61.5B as of Q4 2024.
"""

# Named entity recognition with confidence thresholding
ner = NamedEntityRecognizer(confidence_threshold=0.7)
entities = ner.extract_entities(text)
# → [Entity(name="Dario Amodei", type="PERSON"), Entity(name="Anthropic", type="ORG"),
#    Entity(name="Google", type="ORG"), Entity(name="$7.3B", type="MONEY"), ...]

# Relationship extraction - bidirectional support
rel_extractor = RelationExtractor(confidence_threshold=0.6, bidirectional=True)
relations = rel_extractor.extract_relations(text, entities=entities)
# → [Relation(subject="Dario Amodei", predicate="ceo_of", object="Anthropic"),
#    Relation(subject="Anthropic", predicate="raised", object="$7.3B Series E"), ...]

# Event detection with temporal processing
events = EventDetector(extract_participants=True, extract_time=True).detect_events(text)
# → [Event(type="FUNDING", participants=["Anthropic","Google","Spark Capital"],
#          amount="$7.3B", date="Q4 2024")]

# RDF triplets with optional provenance metadata
triplets = TripletExtractor(include_temporal=True, include_provenance=True).extract_triplets(text)
# → [("Anthropic", "valuation", "$61.5B"), ("Dario Amodei", "is_ceo_of", "Anthropic"), ...]

semantica.kg: Knowledge Graph Construction & Analysis

Build a production knowledge graph from documents and run graph algorithms over it.

from semantica.ingest import FileIngestor
from semantica.kg import (
    GraphBuilder,
    GraphAnalyzer,
    CentralityCalculator,
    CommunityDetector,
    PathFinder,
    LinkPredictor,
    BiTemporalFact,
)
from datetime import datetime

# Build KG - merge duplicate entities, track temporal edges
sources = FileIngestor().ingest_directory("./contracts/", recursive=True)
kg = GraphBuilder(merge_entities=True, enable_temporal=True).build(sources)

# Graph analytics
analyzer    = GraphAnalyzer()
analysis    = analyzer.analyze_graph(kg)             # full graph metrics

centrality  = CentralityCalculator()
degree      = centrality.calculate_degree_centrality(kg)    # most-connected entities
betweenness = centrality.calculate_betweenness_centrality(kg)

communities = CommunityDetector().detect_communities(kg, method="louvain")  # natural clusters
path        = PathFinder().find_shortest_path(kg, "alice_chen", "contract_001")
predictions = LinkPredictor().predict_links(kg, top_k=10)   # relationship predictions

# Bi-temporal facts - track valid time vs. recorded time independently
fact = BiTemporalFact(
    valid_from=datetime(2024, 3, 1),
    valid_until=datetime(2025, 1, 1),
    recorded_at=datetime(2024, 3, 5),
)

semantica.reasoning: Forward Chaining, Rete, Datalog, SPARQL

Run explainable rule-based inference, not a black box.

from semantica.reasoning import ReteEngine, Rule, Fact, RuleType

rete = ReteEngine()
rete.build_network([
    Rule(
        rule_id="aml_flag",
        name="Flag high-risk transactions",
        conditions=[
            {"field": "amount",  "operator": ">",  "value": 10_000},
            {"field": "country", "operator": "in", "value": ["IR", "KP", "SY"]},
        ],
        conclusion="flag_for_compliance_review",
        rule_type=RuleType.IMPLICATION,
    ),
    Rule(
        rule_id="velocity_check",
        name="Flag rapid sequential transfers",
        conditions=[
            {"field": "transfers_in_1h", "operator": ">", "value": 5},
            {"field": "total_amount",    "operator": ">", "value": 50_000},
        ],
        conclusion="flag_velocity_breach",
        rule_type=RuleType.IMPLICATION,
    ),
])

rete.add_fact(Fact("tx_001", "transaction", [{"amount": 15_000, "country": "IR"}]))
flagged = rete.match_patterns()
# → [{"rule": "aml_flag", "matched_facts": ["tx_001"], "conclusion": "flag_for_compliance_review"}]
# Recursive Datalog - natural language for graph queries
from semantica.reasoning import DatalogReasoner

engine = DatalogReasoner()
engine.add_fact("parent(tom, bob)")
engine.add_fact("parent(bob, ann)")
engine.add_fact("parent(ann, pat)")
engine.add_rule("ancestor(X, Y) :- parent(X, Y).")
engine.add_rule("ancestor(X, Z) :- parent(X, Y), ancestor(Y, Z).")
ancestors = engine.query("ancestor(tom, ?X)")
# → [{"X": "bob"}, {"X": "ann"}, {"X": "pat"}]
# Explainable reasoning - trace the path, not just the answer
from semantica.reasoning import ExplanationGenerator, Reasoner

reasoner = Reasoner()
result   = reasoner.infer(kg, rules=[...])

explainer = ExplanationGenerator()
explanation = explainer.generate(result)
# → Explanation(conclusion="...", steps=[ReasoningStep(...)], justification=Justification(...))

semantica.vector_store: Hybrid & Filtered Semantic Search

Drop-in vector store with multiple backends, hybrid search, and decision-aware retrieval.

from semantica.vector_store import VectorStore, HybridSearch

# Works with FAISS, Qdrant, Weaviate, Milvus, Pinecone, PgVector, or in-memory
vs = VectorStore(backend="qdrant", dimension=1536)

# Store a decision with scenario description and outcome
vs.store_decision(
    scenario="Personal loan A-7291, $85k income, 31% DTI, 3yr employment",
    outcome="approved",
    confidence=0.94,
    category="loan_underwriting",
)

# Semantic similarity search
results = vs.search(
    query="personal loan approval with low DTI",
    limit=10,
)

# Hybrid search - dense + sparse retrieval in one pass with RRF fusion
hs   = HybridSearch(vector_store=vs)
hits = hs.search("high-risk transactions 2024")

# Explain why a decision was retrieved
explanation = vs.explain_decision(results[0]["id"])

semantica.split: GraphRAG-Native Document Chunking

KG-aware splitting that preserves entity boundaries, relation triplets, and ontology concepts, essential for GraphRAG pipelines.

from semantica.split import TextSplitter, EntityAwareChunker, RelationAwareChunker

text = open("contracts/master_agreement.txt").read()

# Standard recursive chunking
chunks = TextSplitter(method="recursive", chunk_size=1000, chunk_overlap=200).split(text)

# Entity-aware chunking - never splits a named entity across chunks (GraphRAG)
chunks = TextSplitter(method="entity_aware", ner_method="llm", chunk_size=1000).split(text)

# Relation-aware chunking - preserves (subject, predicate, object) triplets intact
chunks = RelationAwareChunker(chunk_size=1000, preserve_triplets=True).chunk(text)

# Graph-based chunking - uses centrality to find natural community boundaries
chunks = TextSplitter(method="graph_based", chunk_size=1000).split(text)

# Hierarchical chunking - multi-level (section → paragraph → sentence)
chunks = TextSplitter(method="hierarchical", levels=["section", "paragraph"]).split(text)

Supported methods: recursive · token · sentence · paragraph · semantic_transformer · entity_aware · relation_aware · graph_based · ontology_aware · hierarchical · community_detection · centrality_based · llm


semantica.provenance: W3C PROV-O Lineage

Every fact is linked to its source. No black boxes, no mystery outputs.

from semantica.provenance import ProvenanceManager

prov = ProvenanceManager(storage_path="./provenance.db")

# Track where every entity came from
prov.track_entity(
    entity_id="acme_corp",
    source="contracts/acme_master_agreement_2024.pdf",
    metadata={"page": 1, "confidence": 0.97, "extractor": "NamedEntityRecognizer"},
)

prov.track_relationship(
    relationship_id="alice_works_for_acme",
    source_entity_id="alice_chen",
    target_entity_id="acme_corp",
    source="hr_records/employees_q1_2024.csv",
)

# Answer "where did this come from?"
lineage = prov.get_lineage("acme_corp")
trail   = prov.trace_lineage("alice_chen")   # full ancestor chain
entry   = prov.get_provenance("acme_corp")

semantica.ontology: OWL Generation, SHACL Validation

Generate ontologies from data, validate shapes, and manage your vocabulary.

from semantica.ontology import OntologyGenerator, OntologyValidator

data = {
    "entities": [
        {"id": "acme_corp",  "type": "Organization", "industry": "SaaS", "founded": 2012},
        {"id": "alice_chen", "type": "Person",        "role": "CTO",     "since": 2019},
    ],
    "relationships": [
        {"source": "alice_chen", "target": "acme_corp", "type": "works_for"},
    ],
}

gen       = OntologyGenerator(base_uri="https://semantica.dev/ontology/")
ontology  = gen.generate_ontology(data)
classes   = gen.infer_classes(data)
props     = gen.infer_properties(data, classes)
optimized = gen.optimize_ontology(ontology)

# Validate against SHACL shapes
validator = OntologyValidator()
report    = validator.validate(ontology)
# → ValidationResult(conforms=True, errors=[], warnings=[])

semantica.conflicts: Conflict Detection & Resolution

Detect and resolve conflicting facts from multiple sources before they corrupt your knowledge base.

from semantica.conflicts import ConflictDetector, ConflictResolver, SourceTracker

entities_from_source_a = [
    {"id": "alice_chen", "role": "CTO",   "salary": 250_000, "start_date": "2019-03-01"},
]
entities_from_source_b = [
    {"id": "alice_chen", "role": "VP Eng", "salary": 275_000, "start_date": "2019-03-01"},
]

# Detect all conflict types: value, type, relationship, temporal, logical
detector   = ConflictDetector()
conflicts  = detector.detect_conflicts(entities_from_source_a + entities_from_source_b)
# → [Conflict(entity="alice_chen", field="role",   values=["CTO","VP Eng"], severity="HIGH"),
#    Conflict(entity="alice_chen", field="salary",  values=[250000,275000],   severity="MEDIUM")]

# Resolve using multiple strategies
resolver = ConflictResolver()
resolved = resolver.resolve(conflicts, strategy="credibility_weighted")  # weighted by source trust
resolved = resolver.resolve(conflicts, strategy="temporal")              # prefer most recent
resolved = resolver.resolve(conflicts, strategy="voting")                # majority wins

# Track source credibility over time
tracker = SourceTracker()
tracker.track("source_a", credibility=0.85)
tracker.track("source_b", credibility=0.72)

semantica.deduplication: Entity Resolution at Scale

Block, cluster, and merge duplicates with semantic similarity. 6.98× faster than baseline.

from semantica.deduplication import DuplicateDetector, EntityMerger

entities = [
    {"id": "e1", "name": "Acme Corporation",  "domain": "acme.com"},
    {"id": "e2", "name": "Acme Corp.",         "domain": "acme.com"},
    {"id": "e3", "name": "ACME Corp",          "domain": "acme.co"},
    {"id": "e4", "name": "Globex Industries",  "domain": "globex.com"},
]

detector   = DuplicateDetector(similarity_threshold=0.75, use_clustering=True)
candidates = detector.detect_duplicates(entities)
groups     = detector.detect_duplicate_groups(entities)
# → DuplicateGroup(entities=["e1","e2","e3"], confidence=0.91, strategy="semantic+blocking")

merger  = EntityMerger(preserve_provenance=True)
ops     = merger.merge_duplicates(entities, strategy="keep_most_complete")
history = merger.get_merge_history()

semantica.normalize: Data Normalization & Cleaning

Standardize text, entities, dates, numbers, and encodings before building your knowledge graph.

from semantica.normalize import (
    TextNormalizer,
    EntityNormalizer,
    DateNormalizer,
    NumberNormalizer,
    DataCleaner,
)

# Unicode, whitespace, casing, HTML tags, smart quotes
text  = TextNormalizer().normalize("  Acme Corp.’s Q4 report…  ")
# → "Acme Corp.'s Q4 report..."

# Alias resolution + entity disambiguation with confidence scores
names = EntityNormalizer().normalize_entity("ACME Corp.")
# → NormalizedEntity(canonical="Acme Corporation", type="Organization", confidence=0.91)

# Natural language date parsing with timezone conversion
dt    = DateNormalizer().normalize_date("3 weeks ago")
# → datetime(2026, 5, 22, tzinfo=UTC)

# Unit conversion and currency normalization
price = NumberNormalizer().normalize("$1.25M USD")
# → NormalizedNumber(value=1_250_000, currency="USD")

# Deduplicate and impute missing values across a dataset
clean = DataCleaner().clean(records, dedup_threshold=0.9, fill_missing="mean")

semantica.pipeline: Pipeline DSL

Compose ingestion, extraction, and graph-building into a declarative, parallel pipeline.

from semantica.pipeline import PipelineBuilder, ExecutionEngine

pipeline = (
    PipelineBuilder()
    .add_step("ingest",      step_type="ingest",           source="./contracts/", recursive=True)
    .add_step("extract",     step_type="ner_extract")
    .add_step("relations",   step_type="relation_extract")
    .add_step("build_kg",    step_type="kg_build",         merge_entities=True)
    .add_step("deduplicate", step_type="deduplicate",      threshold=0.75)
    .add_step("export",      step_type="export",           format="turtle", output="kg.ttl")
    .connect_steps("ingest",      "extract")
    .connect_steps("extract",     "relations")
    .connect_steps("relations",   "build_kg")
    .connect_steps("build_kg",    "deduplicate")
    .connect_steps("deduplicate", "export")
    .set_parallelism(4)
    .build(name="contracts_pipeline")
)

engine   = ExecutionEngine()
result   = engine.execute(pipeline)
status   = engine.get_status(pipeline)
progress = engine.get_progress(pipeline)

Temporal Intelligence: Bi-Temporal Graphs & Time Travel

Track when facts were true in the world vs. when they were recorded, and query either axis.

from semantica.context import ContextGraph
from semantica.kg import (
    BiTemporalFact,
    TemporalGraphQuery,
    TemporalVersionManager,
    TemporalNormalizer,
)
from datetime import datetime

graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)
graph.add_node("alice_chen", "Person",       role="VP Engineering")
graph.add_node("acme_corp",  "Organization", valuation=1_200_000_000)

# Point-in-time snapshots - replay history without reprocessing
snapshot_2023 = graph.state_at("2023-06-01")
snapshot_2024 = graph.state_at("2024-01-01")

# Bi-temporal facts - valid_time is when true in the world;
# recorded_at is when you learned about it
fact = BiTemporalFact(
    valid_from=datetime(2024, 3, 1),
    valid_until=datetime(2025, 1, 1),
    recorded_at=datetime(2024, 3, 5),
)

# Allen interval algebra - 13 temporal relations (before, during, overlaps, etc.)
tq = TemporalGraphQuery(graph)
facts_in_window = tq.query_time_range("2024-01-01", "2024-12-31")

# Normalize natural language temporal expressions
norm = TemporalNormalizer()
dt   = norm.normalize("last quarter")  # → datetime range for Q1 2026

semantica.export: RDF, OWL, Parquet, Cypher, JSON-LD

Export to any format required by regulators, graph databases, or downstream systems.

from semantica.export import (
    RDFExporter,
    JSONExporter,
    ParquetExporter,
    LPGExporter,
    ReportGenerator,
)

kg = {"entities": [...], "relationships": [...]}

rdf = RDFExporter()
turtle_str = rdf.export_to_rdf(kg, format="turtle")     # returns string
jsonld_str = rdf.export_to_rdf(kg, format="json-ld")

rdf.export(kg, "kg_audit.ttl",    format="turtle")
rdf.export(kg, "kg_audit.jsonld", format="json-ld")
rdf.export(kg, "kg_audit.nt",     format="n-triples")

# Columnar analytics - Snappy-compressed Parquet
ParquetExporter().export(kg, "kg_snapshot.parquet", compression="snappy")

# JSON knowledge graph
JSONExporter().export_knowledge_graph(kg, "kg.json")

# Neo4j / Memgraph Cypher statements for graph database import
LPGExporter().export(kg, "kg_import.cypher", method="cypher")

# Human-readable HTML / Markdown report
ReportGenerator().generate(kg, "audit_report.html", format="html")

semantica.visualization: Interactive Graph Workbench

Render force-directed graphs, community maps, ontology hierarchies, and temporal dashboards.

from semantica.visualization import (
    KGVisualizer,
    OntologyVisualizer,
    EmbeddingVisualizer,
    TemporalVisualizer,
)
import numpy as np

kg = {"entities": [...], "relationships": [...]}

# Interactive force-directed graph (opens in browser)
viz = KGVisualizer(layout="force", color_scheme="default")
viz.visualize_network(kg, output="interactive", file_path="kg.html")
viz.visualize_communities(kg, communities, output="interactive")
viz.visualize_centrality(kg, centrality, centrality_type="degree")
viz.visualize_entity_types(kg, output="html", file_path="entity_types.html")

# Ontology class hierarchy
OntologyVisualizer().visualize_hierarchy(ontology, output="interactive")

# 2D embedding projection (UMAP / t-SNE / PCA)
EmbeddingVisualizer().visualize_2d_projection(
    embeddings=np.array([...]),
    labels=["entity_a", "entity_b"],
    method="umap",
)

# Timeline scrubber - watch the graph evolve
TemporalVisualizer().visualize_timeline(kg, output="interactive")

Multi-Agent Shared Context with Agno

One shared intelligence layer. All agents read and write to the same context graph.

# pip install semantica[agno]
from agno.agent import Agent
from agno.team import Team
from agno.models.anthropic import Claude
from semantica.context import ContextGraph
from semantica.vector_store import VectorStore
from integrations.agno import AgnoSharedContext, AgnoDecisionKit, AgnoKGToolkit

shared = AgnoSharedContext(
    vector_store=VectorStore(backend="faiss"),
    knowledge_graph=ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True),
    decision_tracking=True,
)

researcher = Agent(
    name="Researcher",
    model=Claude(id="claude-sonnet-4-6"),
    memory=shared.bind_agent("researcher"),
    tools=[AgnoKGToolkit(context=shared)],
)
analyst = Agent(
    name="Analyst",
    model=Claude(id="claude-sonnet-4-6"),
    memory=shared.bind_agent("analyst"),
    tools=[AgnoDecisionKit(context=shared)],
)

team = Team(agents=[researcher, analyst], mode="coordinate")
# Researcher's findings are instantly available to the Analyst - no copy, no sync

runnable notebooks in the cookbook, each self-contained and runnable in under 5 minutes


Recipes

Copy-paste patterns for the most common use cases.

End-to-End GraphRAG Pipeline

from semantica.ingest import FileIngestor
from semantica.split import TextSplitter
from semantica.semantic_extract import NamedEntityRecognizer, RelationExtractor
from semantica.kg import GraphBuilder
from semantica.vector_store import VectorStore, HybridSearch
from semantica.context import AgentContext

# 1. Ingest
docs = FileIngestor().ingest_directory("./docs/", recursive=True)

# 2. Entity-aware chunking - never splits an entity across a chunk boundary
splitter = TextSplitter(method="entity_aware", chunk_size=1000)
chunks   = [splitter.split(doc["text"]) for doc in docs]

# 3. Extract entities and relations
ner      = NamedEntityRecognizer(confidence_threshold=0.7)
rel_ext  = RelationExtractor(confidence_threshold=0.6)
entities = [ner.extract_entities(chunk) for chunk_group in chunks for chunk in chunk_group]

# 4. Build KG
kg = GraphBuilder(merge_entities=True, enable_temporal=True).build(docs)

# 5. Hybrid retrieval
vs  = VectorStore(backend="faiss")
ctx = AgentContext(vector_store=vs, knowledge_graph=kg)
ctx.store("Alice approved the Acme renewal in Q1 2024", conversation_id="c1")

results = HybridSearch(vector_store=vs).search("who approved the renewal?")

Audit Trail for a Regulated Decision

from semantica.context import ContextGraph
from semantica.provenance import ProvenanceManager
from semantica.export import RDFExporter

graph = ContextGraph(advanced_analytics=True)
prov  = ProvenanceManager(storage_path="./audit.db")

# Record the decision chain
d1 = graph.record_decision(
    category="loan_application", scenario="A-7291, $85k income",
    reasoning="Income threshold met", outcome="proceed", confidence=0.88,
)
d2 = graph.record_decision(
    category="loan_underwriting", scenario="Underwriting A-7291",
    reasoning="Clean credit history", outcome="approved", confidence=0.94,
)
graph.add_causal_relationship(d1, d2, relationship_type="triggers")

# Track provenance for every entity
prov.track_entity("applicant_A7291", source="loan_application_form.pdf",
                  metadata={"page": 1, "extractor": "NamedEntityRecognizer"})

# Export W3C PROV-O for regulator submission
kg = graph.export_graph()
RDFExporter().export(kg, "audit_trail.ttl", format="turtle")

AML Rules Engine

from semantica.reasoning import ReteEngine, Rule, Fact, RuleType

rete = ReteEngine()
rete.build_network([
    Rule(
        rule_id="sanctions_check",
        name="Flag sanctioned-country transactions",
        conditions=[
            {"field": "amount",  "operator": ">",  "value": 10_000},
            {"field": "country", "operator": "in", "value": ["IR", "KP", "SY", "CU"]},
        ],
        conclusion="flag_for_compliance_review",
        rule_type=RuleType.IMPLICATION,
    ),
])
rete.add_fact(Fact("tx_99", "transaction", [{"amount": 25_000, "country": "IR"}]))
matches = rete.match_patterns()
# → [{"rule": "sanctions_check", "matched_facts": ["tx_99"],
#     "conclusion": "flag_for_compliance_review"}]

Ontology-to-Knowledge-Graph in One Pass

from semantica.ingest import FileIngestor
from semantica.semantic_extract import NamedEntityRecognizer, RelationExtractor
from semantica.kg import GraphBuilder
from semantica.ontology import OntologyGenerator, OntologyValidator
from semantica.export import RDFExporter

sources   = FileIngestor().ingest_directory("./contracts/")
ner       = NamedEntityRecognizer(confidence_threshold=0.7)
entities  = ner.extract_entities_batch([s["text"] for s in sources])

kg  = GraphBuilder(merge_entities=True).build(sources)
gen = OntologyGenerator(base_uri="https://myco.dev/ontology/")
ont = gen.generate_ontology({"entities": entities[0], "relationships": []})

report = OntologyValidator().validate(ont)
if report.conforms:
    RDFExporter().export({"entities": entities[0]}, "ontology.ttl", format="turtle")

Performance

Benchmarks from v0.5.0 on a 118,000-node production graph:

Operation Before After Improvement
Node search (118k nodes) 24 ms 0.004 ms 6,000× faster
Embedding cache hit cold load revision-based cache 10× throughput
Semantic deduplication baseline optimized candidate gen 6.98× faster
Candidate generation baseline blocking strategy 63.6% faster

Measured on a 118,000-node production graph (AMD EPYC, 64 GB RAM). Results vary by hardware, dataset topology, and backend selection. Run pytest tests/vector_store/test_performance_benchmarks.py -s to measure your own data.


CLI

Every capability is available from the terminal. The CLI ships with the package, no separate install required.

pip install semantica
semantica        # startup dashboard
semantica doctor # health check
semantica --help # full grouped command reference

Start with semantica, verify with doctor, build a graph, and explore the command groups from one terminal.

Command groups: ingest · parse · extract · kg · reason · decision · temporal · provenance · ontology · embed · deduplicate · validate · export · visualize · pipeline · server · explorer · mcp · doctor · shell · init · watch

Full CLI reference


Integrations

Native plugin bundles across major editors, a full-featured MCP server, a comprehensive REST API, and first-class Agno support. All LLM providers already supported: OpenAI · Anthropic · Gemini · Mistral · Llama · Groq · Cohere · Azure · Bedrock · Ollama · DeepSeek · HuggingFace and more via LiteLLM

Native Plugin Bundle MCP Server + Plugin
Claude Code
Claude Code
Skills · agents · hooks
Cursor
Cursor
Skills · agents
Codex CLI
Codex CLI
Skills · agents
Windsurf
Windsurf
plugin
Cline
Cline
plugin
Continue
Continue
plugin
VS Code
VS Code
plugin
OpenClaw
OpenClaw
MCP + plugin
MCP Server REST API
Claude Desktop
Claude Desktop
MCP server
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot
REST API
Roo Code
Roo Code
REST API
Goose
Goose
REST API
Kilo Code
Kilo Code
REST API
Aider
Aider
REST API
Amazon Q
Amazon Q
REST API
Zed
Zed
REST API

Agentic Frameworks

Native Integration
Agno
Agno
First-class · pip install semantica[agno]
Already Supported via REST API & MCP
LangChain
LangChain
REST API · MCP
LangGraph
LangGraph
REST API · MCP
CrewAI
CrewAI
REST API · MCP
LlamaIndex
LlamaIndex
REST API · MCP
AutoGen
AutoGen
REST API · MCP
OpenAI Agents SDK
OpenAI Agents
REST API · MCP
Google ADK
Google ADK
REST API · MCP
Native SDK Integration (Coming Soon)
LangChain
LangChain
Dedicated toolkit
CrewAI
CrewAI
Dedicated toolkit
LlamaIndex
LlamaIndex
Dedicated toolkit
AutoGen
AutoGen
Dedicated toolkit
OpenAI Agents SDK
OpenAI Agents
Dedicated toolkit
Google ADK
Google ADK
Dedicated toolkit

MCP Server

Connect any MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, Windsurf, Cline, VS Code) in 30 seconds:

python -m semantica.mcp_server
# or via the installed entry point
semantica-mcp
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "semantica": { "command": "python", "args": ["-m", "semantica.mcp_server"] }
  }
}

Tools exposed over MCP:

Tool What it does
extract_entities NER on any text
extract_relations Relation extraction
record_decision Persist a decision node
query_decisions Search decision history
find_precedents Semantic precedent lookup
get_causal_chain Full causal ancestry
add_entity Add a KG node
add_relationship Add a KG edge
run_reasoning Execute rule set
get_graph_analytics Centrality, communities
export_graph Export to RDF/JSON/Parquet
get_graph_summary Graph statistics

REST API

# Start the backend
python -m semantica.server   # port 8000

# Extract entities via REST
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/extract/entities \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"text": "Apple CEO Tim Cook announced record earnings."}'

# Record a decision
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/decisions \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "category": "vendor_selection",
    "scenario": "Choose ML cloud provider",
    "reasoning": "Best GPU availability and pricing",
    "outcome": "selected_aws",
    "confidence": 0.91
  }'

# Query the knowledge graph
curl http://localhost:8000/api/graph/neighbors/acme_corp?hops=2

REST endpoints span: extract · kg · decisions · reasoning · provenance · ontology · embeddings · search · export · pipeline · temporal · deduplication


Plugin Bundles

Domain skills: extract · ingest · query · ontology · validate · deduplicate · embed · reason · decision · causal · temporal · provenance · policy · explain · export · change · visualize

Specialized agents: kg-assistant · decision-advisor · explainability

Bundles for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, Cline, Continue, VS Code, and OpenClaw in plugins/.


Knowledge Explorer

A browser-based graph workbench. Pan and zoom live graphs, scrub the timeline, review every decision's causal chain, resolve duplicates, and author your ontology visually. Built on React 19 + Sigma.js.

Workspace What you can do
Knowledge Graph Live Sigma.js canvas with ForceAtlas2 layout, Ego Mode, semantic distance heatmap
Timeline Scrub through temporal events and watch the graph evolve
Decisions Browse the causal chain behind every recorded decision
Registry Live audit log of every graph mutation
Entity Resolution Review and merge duplicates
Ontology Hub SHACL Studio, visual editor, cross-ontology alignments, SKOS browser
Lineage W3C PROV-O provenance visualization for any entity

Quickest way to start (no Node.js required):

pip install "semantica[explorer]"
semantica-explorer --graph my_graph.json
# Dashboard opens at http://127.0.0.1:8000

For contributor / dev-server setup, see the full local setup guide:

explorer/README.md: Local Setup Guide


Features at a Glance

Capability Highlights
Context Graphs Queryable graph of entities, decisions, relationships; causal links; cross-graph navigation
Decision Intelligence record_decision · trace_decision_chain · find_similar_decisions · analyze_decision_impact · check_decision_rules
Temporal Intelligence Point-in-time snapshots · Allen interval algebra (13 relations) · TemporalNormalizer · bi-temporal provenance
Distance Intelligence N×N semantic distance matrices · ego-mode visualization · distance bands · 10× embedding cache
Semantic Extraction NER · relation extraction · event detection · triplet generation · coreference · 6.98× faster dedup
Reasoning Engines Forward chaining · Rete · deductive · abductive · SPARQL · Datalog with explainable output
GraphRAG Chunking Entity-aware · relation-aware · graph-based · ontology-aware · community-detection chunking
Conflict Detection Value / type / relationship / temporal / logical conflicts · 5 resolution strategies
Provenance W3C PROV-O · every fact traced to source · audit log export JSON/CSV/RDF
Ontology Hub SHACL Studio · visual editor · cross-ontology alignments · 5-dimension health dashboard
Vector Store FAISS · Pinecone · Weaviate · Qdrant · Milvus · PgVector · hybrid + filtered search
Graph Databases (LPG) Neo4j · FalkorDB · Apache AGE · AWS Neptune
Triple Stores (RDF) Blazegraph · Apache Jena · Eclipse RDF4J · unified TripletStore interface · SPARQL query & bulk load
LLM Providers All already supported today: OpenAI (GPT-4o, o1, o3) · Anthropic (Claude 4) · Google Gemini · Mistral · Meta Llama · Groq · Cohere · Azure OpenAI · AWS Bedrock · Ollama · DeepSeek · Perplexity · Together AI · Fireworks AI · Replicate · HuggingFace · via semantica.llms and LiteLLM

What's New in v0.5.1

  • Apache Arrow & Feather Ingestion: Read .arrow, .feather, and .ipc files via ArrowIngestor; selective column reads, row limits, batch-aware iteration; auto-detected by extension and IPC magic bytes. Install with pip install semantica[ingest-arrow]

  • Knowledge Explorer Deployment Templates: Ready-to-use deploy/ configs for major cloud platforms; fixed Dockerfile, full-stack Compose, /api/health endpoint, env-var wired FALKORDB_HOST/ALLOWED_ORIGINS

    Docker Railway Render Fly.io GCP Cloud Run Azure Kubernetes Helm

  • Neo4j Bulk CSV Export: Neo4jCSVExporter for neo4j-admin database import; deterministic output, SHA-256 stable node IDs, multi-label support, dry_run() validation

Full release notes · Changelog


Built for High-Stakes Domains

Semantica is designed for environments where AI outputs must be explainable, auditable, and defensible.

  • Healthcare: Clinical decision support, drug interaction graphs, and patient safety audit trails
  • Finance: Fraud detection, AML compliance, regulatory risk knowledge graphs, and loan decision audit trails
  • Legal: Evidence-backed research, contract analysis, case law reasoning, and privilege tracking
  • Cybersecurity: Threat attribution, incident response timelines, and IOC provenance tracking
  • Government: Policy decision records, classified information governance, and regulatory reporting
  • Autonomous Systems: Decision logs, safety validation, and explainable AI for certification

Installation

pip install semantica           # core
pip install semantica[all]      # everything
pip install semantica[agno]                 # Agno multi-agent integration
pip install semantica[llm-litellm]          # OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Mistral, Llama, Groq, Cohere, Bedrock, Ollama, DeepSeek, and more
pip install semantica[graph-neo4j]          # Neo4j graph store (LPG)
pip install semantica[graph-falkordb]       # FalkorDB graph store (LPG)
pip install semantica[graph-apache-age]     # Apache AGE graph store (LPG)
pip install semantica[graph-amazon-neptune] # AWS Neptune graph store (LPG)
# RDF triple stores (Blazegraph, Apache Jena, Eclipse RDF4J) need no extra —
# semantica.triplet_store talks SPARQL over HTTP using the core `requests` dependency
pip install semantica[vectorstore-qdrant]   # Qdrant vector store
pip install semantica[vectorstore-pinecone] # Pinecone vector store
pip install semantica[db-snowflake]         # Snowflake
pip install semantica[ingest-parquet]       # Parquet / PyArrow
pip install semantica[ingest-arrow]        # Apache Arrow, Feather, IPC
pip install semantica[viz]                  # HTML interactive visualization
pip install semantica[watch]                # Directory file watcher

For production deployments, use Docker or Kubernetes rather than a local pip install. Set SEMANTICA_SECRET_KEY, configure a persistent LPG graph store (Neo4j / FalkorDB / Apache AGE / AWS Neptune) and/or RDF triple store (Blazegraph / Apache Jena / Eclipse RDF4J), and point the vector store at a hosted backend (Qdrant / Pinecone). See ARCHITECTURE.md for the full deployment topology.

# From source
git clone https://github.com/semantica-agi/semantica.git
cd semantica && pip install -e ".[dev]" && pytest tests/

Enterprise

On-premises deployment · Private cloud · Custom domain implementations · SLA-backed support · Professional services for regulated industries (healthcare, finance, legal, government).

getsemantica.ai for enterprise solutions and pricing.


Community & Support

Discord discord.gg/sV34vps5hH: real-time help, showcases, and announcements
GitHub Discussions Q&A and feature requests
GitHub Issues Bug reports
Documentation docs.getsemantica.ai
Cookbook Runnable Jupyter notebooks
Changelog CHANGELOG.md · Release Notes

Star History

Star History Chart

Contributors

Contributors


Contributing

All contributions are welcome: bug fixes, features, tests, and documentation.

  1. Fork the repo and create a branch
  2. pip install -e ".[dev]"
  3. Write tests alongside your changes (pytest tests/)
  4. Open a PR and tag @KaifAhmad1 for review

See CONTRIBUTING.md for full guidelines.


MIT License · Built by Semantica

GitHub  ·  Discord  ·  Twitter/X  ·  Website  ·  Docs  ·  PyPI

If this project helps you build better AI, a star means a lot.

⭐ Star on GitHub →

English · Deutsch · Français · Español · Italiano · Português · العربية · اردو · हिन्दी · 中文 · 日本語 · 한국어

About

Semantica • Build AI systems that can explain, trace, and justify every decision. Knowledge graphs, context graphs, reasoning engines, provenance, and governance for production AI.

Topics

Resources

License

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

1.4k stars

Watchers

21 watching

Forks

Sponsor this project

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors