Skip to content

Use alerts for executor process reporting and stdout if stderr not available #372

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

kzscisoft
Copy link
Collaborator

This moves from using events to draw attention to failing processes added via the executor to instead using user alerts. Also in the case where stderr is empty, the last 10 lines of stdout are given in the logging output.

The user is still able to see info relating to the failing run as the uploaded out and err files.

@kzscisoft kzscisoft added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 3, 2024
@kzscisoft kzscisoft added this to the v1.0 milestone Jun 3, 2024
@kzscisoft kzscisoft self-assigned this Jun 3, 2024
Use tail of stdout if stderr gives no error information
@kzscisoft kzscisoft force-pushed the hotfix/user-alerts-for-error-status branch from 1adc1cc to 3f628d1 Compare June 3, 2024 11:25
@kzscisoft kzscisoft merged commit 1df1330 into dev Jun 3, 2024
4 of 10 checks passed
@kzscisoft kzscisoft deleted the hotfix/user-alerts-for-error-status branch June 3, 2024 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant