SNOW-1962180: Support relaxed pandas in pd.read_snowflake for query data sources

[sfc-gh-helmeleegy]

1. Which Jira issue is this PR addressing? Make sure that there is an accompanying issue to your PR.

   Fixes SNOW-1962180

2. Fill out the following pre-review checklist:

   • I am adding a new automated test(s) to verify correctness of my new code
     • If this test skips Local Testing mode, I'm requesting review from @snowflakedb/local-testing
   • I am adding new logging messages
   • I am adding a new telemetry message
   • I am adding new credentials
   • I am adding a new dependency
   • If this is a new feature/behavior, I'm adding the Local Testing parity changes.
   • I acknowledge that I have ensured my changes to be thread-safe. Follow the link for more information: Thread-safe Developer Guidelines

3. Please describe how your code solves the related issue.

   Support relaxed pandas in pd.read_snowflake for query data sources.

[sfc-gh-snowflakedb-snyk-sa]

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

✅ security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

✅ license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

[sfc-gh-joshi]

Could you clarify the intended behavior when an ORDER BY clause is encountered in a query, both with and without relaxed pandas?

[sfc-gh-nkrishna]

LGTM once Jonathan's comments are addressed

[sfc-gh-helmeleegy]

Could you clarify the intended behavior when an ORDER BY clause is encountered in a query, both with and without relaxed pandas?

The order by can only guarantee that the input data is ordered in a certain way. But it does not guarantee how the output data (after applying some pandas operations) will be ordered. I updated the docstring accordingly.