Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test #1470

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test #1470

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

15669072513
Copy link

@15669072513 15669072513 commented Feb 7, 2025

test

Motivation:

Explain the context, and why you're making that change.
To make others understand what is the problem you're trying to solve.

Modification:

Describe the idea and modifications you've done.

Result:

Fixes #.

If there is no issue then describe the changes introduced by this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the project overview with a minor textual addition to enhance clarity without impacting functionality.

@sofastack-cla sofastack-cla bot added cla:yes CLA is ok First-time contributor First-time contributor size/XS labels Feb 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request makes a minor update to the SOFARPC project's README. Specifically, it appends the phrase "test for sca." to the end of the Overview section. No modifications are made to any public or exported entities, and the overall document functionality remains unchanged.

Changes

File Summary of Changes
README.md Appended the phrase "test for sca." to the Overview section.

Poem

Oh, I’m a happy bunny in the code field,
Hopping through changes with a skip and a yield.
A tiny text tweak, a joyful little tweak,
In the README’s tale, a new phrase to seek.
With whiskers and ears, I cheer this small tweak!
🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

12-12: Clarify the appended phrase in the Overview section.
The phrase "test for sca." appended at the end of the Overview is ambiguous. It would be helpful to briefly clarify what "sca" stands for or its purpose in this context, especially since the PR description and overall context don’t provide further details. Additionally, consider revising the sentence for improved grammar (e.g., "is dedicated to simplifying RPC calls…" might read more naturally).

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~12-~12: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ...ve generations. SOFARPC is dedicated to simplify RPC calls between applications, and pro...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)


[uncategorized] ~12-~12: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ...ify RPC calls between applications, and provide convenient, no code intrusion, stable, ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be93251 and 5402f75.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~12-~12: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ...ve generations. SOFARPC is dedicated to simplify RPC calls between applications, and pro...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)


[uncategorized] ~12-~12: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ...ify RPC calls between applications, and provide convenient, no code intrusion, stable, ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build

@15669072513 15669072513 closed this by deleting the head repository Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla:yes CLA is ok First-time contributor First-time contributor size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant