Skip to content

Conversation

@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2025 16:24
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @Alex-Welsh, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the required GitHub status checks for the ansible-collection-pulp repository. The changes primarily involve adjusting the versions for integration tests and upgrading the Ansible lint and sanity check versions to align with more recent Ansible releases, ensuring that the project's CI/CD pipeline uses up-to-date tooling and test environments.

Highlights

  • Integration Checks Update: The required integration status checks for ansible-collection-pulp have been updated, removing integration (3.21) and introducing integration (3.81).
  • Ansible Lint and Sanity Check Upgrade: The required lint and sanity checks have been upgraded to use newer Ansible versions, specifically moving from Ansible 2.12 and 2.14 to 2.18 and 2.20.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the required status checks for the ansible-collection-pulp repository, replacing older Ansible and integration versions with newer ones. The change is straightforward and looks correct. I have one suggestion to reorder the list of checks to improve long-term maintainability by grouping them by version.

@stackhpc-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Terraform Format and Style 🖌success

Terraform Initialization ⚙️success

Terraform Validation 🤖success

Validation Output

Success! The configuration is valid.


Terraform Plan 📖success

Show Plan

undefined

Pusher: @Alex-Welsh, Action: pull_request, Working Directory: ``, Workflow: Terraform GitHub

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants