use the_crawl-based package reviewer

[braver]

No description provided.

[braver]

@kaste

This is really good actually, using your latest version of the reviewer. I think it has all the output I'd want.

So, as a user of this thing I really want this :D I hope you and Fichte can work out how to manage the repo. IMO I can continue to just use your fork here. The old package test action also did not really depend on his repo anyway.

[kaste]

It becomes easier to decipher when you just have one job(?) per action(?) / file.

I may just merge into the forked main which is easier to use and to see and remember.

[michaelblyons]

Where it says "CHECK," is it possible to (also?) include the name of the package being tested?

[kaste]

Why shouldn't that be possible, it's computers. But I also have a question:

@braver, can you just set

  permissions:
    contents: read
    pull-requests: write

in the workflow here, and I write a PR comment.

[braver]

Done

[braver]

📦