design 2 completed

[MeetDobariya275]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

Strengths:

• The implementation is correct and matches the reference solution.
• The student provides clear comments explaining the approach and time complexity.
• The code is well-structured and readable.

Areas for Improvement:

• The indentation in the empty method is slightly off (uses tabs instead of spaces consistently). While this doesn't affect functionality, consistent indentation improves readability.
• The comment # Your code here along with comments explaining your approach could be removed as it doesn't add value beyond the actual comments provided.