Completed Desgin-2

[addi091]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

Strengths:

1. Both implementations are correct and efficient, matching the reference solutions in terms of time and space complexity.
2. The code is well-structured and readable, with appropriate comments and method names.
3. The use of driver code to test the implementations is excellent practice.

Areas for Improvement:

1. For the MyQueue class, the peek() method could be optimized slightly by checking if outSt is empty before transferring elements from inSt, but the current implementation is already efficient.
2. For the MyHashMap class, the getHash method could be made private to better encapsulate the implementation details, although this is a minor point.
3. The comments could be more detailed, especially explaining the amortized time complexity for the queue operations.

Overall, the student has done an excellent job with both implementations. The solutions are correct, efficient, and well-structured.