Skip to content

[ModuleGraph] Bring back original check for implicit system libraries #8824

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

xedin
Copy link
Contributor

@xedin xedin commented Jun 13, 2025

The original check was about system libraries only, the new one checks all of the implicit modules.

The original check was about system libraries only, the new one
checks all of the implicit modules.
@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jun 13, 2025

@swift-ci please test

dschaefer2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2025
…aries (#8825)

Cherry-pick of
#8824

---

- Explanation:

The original check was about system libraries only, the new one filters
all of the implicit modules (including snippets) which is incorrect. The
is a follow-up to
#8812

- Main Branch PR:
#8824

- Risk: Low

- Reviewed By: @bnbarham 

- Testing: No testing was added, speculative fix.

(cherry picked from commit 68d07f2)
@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jun 14, 2025

@swift-ci please test Windows platform

2 similar comments
@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jun 14, 2025

@swift-ci please test Windows platform

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jun 14, 2025

@swift-ci please test Windows platform

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jun 15, 2025

swiftlang/swift-driver#1931
@swift-ci please test Windows platform

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Jun 16, 2025

@swift-ci please test Windows platform

@xedin xedin merged commit ffd78a7 into swiftlang:main Jun 16, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants