Skip to content

Conversation

@fruitful1l
Copy link

Added TEP89 Proof alongside minor change in the JettonVault storage, now containing the ref to Proxy contract code. Made temporary wrapper for it, requires tests adaptation from tact dex repo.

@fruitful1l fruitful1l changed the title feat: add TEP89Proxy standard proof added feat: TEP89Proxy standard proof added Dec 6, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@Kaladin13 Kaladin13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great pr overall: let's add tests (perfectly just make existing one work) and fix a few comments

action: Cell<JettonTransferNotificationWithVaultAction>
}

struct (0xd1735400) TakeWalletAddress {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe let's reuse existing message type? I think it already exist

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't exist in messages.tolk, couldn't find it in other files as well, not sure if it's somewhere there

includeAddress: bool
}

type AllowedMessagesForProxy = TakeWalletAddress
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's move this to the place where it is used, e.g. proxy.tolk on top

}

fun checkProof(proof: JettonVaultProof, minter: address, msgSender: address) {
fun exit(): void
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lets add comment why we need this (also cant we do this with raw return since this is Tolk?)

discoveryId: uint64 // Unique discovery ID (salt)
}

fun ProxyStorage.load() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Move to the proxy file on top

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants