Skip to content

Conversation

@arcoraven
Copy link
Contributor

@arcoraven arcoraven commented Jul 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated deployment configuration to use the Vercel adapter instead of the static site adapter.
    • Adjusted package dependencies and build scripts for improved debugging and deployment.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
web3-onboard-docs ❌ Failed (Inspect) Jul 23, 2025 4:00am

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the SvelteKit project configuration and dependencies to switch deployment from a static site model to the Vercel serverless platform. This involves replacing the static adapter with the Vercel adapter and adjusting related package dependencies, including modifying build script options and rearranging some package entries.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/package.json Removed @sveltejs/adapter-static, added @sveltejs/adapter-vercel@^5.8.0, modified build script environment variables, and reordered @web3-onboard/para dependency.
docs/svelte.config.js Replaced import and usage of static adapter with Vercel adapter in SvelteKit configuration.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant SvelteKit
    participant Vercel Adapter

    Developer->>SvelteKit: Build project
    SvelteKit->>Vercel Adapter: Use adapter-vercel for deployment
    Vercel Adapter->>SvelteKit: Prepare serverless output
    SvelteKit->>Developer: Output ready for Vercel deployment
Loading

Estimated code review effort

2 (~10–30 minutes)


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b8c74d and c591d1a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/package.json (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Socket Security: Pull Request Alerts
  • GitHub Check: Checks

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/svelte.config.js (1)

11-15: Consider reviewing prerender configuration for serverless deployment.

The current prerender configuration with entries: ['*'] prerenders all routes, which may not be optimal for a serverless Vercel deployment. Consider whether all routes need prerendering or if some should be server-rendered on demand.

Additionally, you might want to explore Vercel adapter-specific options such as runtime configuration, edge functions, or ISR settings.

Example Vercel adapter configuration:

adapter({
  runtime: 'nodejs18.x',
  regions: ['iad1'],
  isr: {
    expiration: 60
  }
})
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bdc77c6 and 8b8c74d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • docs/yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/package.json (2 hunks)
  • docs/svelte.config.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/package.json (2)

54-54: LGTM: Correct adapter dependency placement.

The addition of @sveltejs/adapter-vercel to dependencies is appropriate for the SvelteKit Vercel deployment transition.


77-77: Confirm @web3-onboard/para v1 compatibility
File: docs/package.json (line 77)

Snippet:

    "@web3-onboard/para": "^1.0.0",

No direct code imports of @web3-onboard/para were detected, but downgrading from v2.x to v1.x may introduce breaking changes alongside other Web3 Onboard packages at v2.x. Please:

  • Search for any @web3-onboard/para references in Svelte, Markdown or example files.
  • Verify that the v1 connector still works with @web3-onboard/[email protected].
  • Run the docs preview/build to ensure there are no runtime or build errors.
docs/svelte.config.js (1)

1-1: LGTM: Correct adapter import.

The import change to @sveltejs/adapter-vercel aligns with the package.json dependency and PR objective.

@socket-security
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants