-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Refactor and update file checks logic #373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2035ffb
Refactor and update file checks logic
fdrose 6c50c1f
Style
fdrose 2c14af0
Style
fdrose 1a261d0
Fix message dtype
fdrose 4a7797e
Fix check return type
fdrose dfea707
fix tests
fdrose f11307e
fix tests
fdrose 775167b
fix tests
fdrose 88c54fc
style
fdrose 0aae8f2
add tests
fdrose 4fd70eb
style
fdrose b08bdda
Merge branch 'main' into mabraham/eng-29561
fdrose bbc32bc
fix test
fdrose 2a1efd1
fix return type
fdrose c79aca1
fix return type
fdrose 93e580a
bump version
fdrose 92e4748
bump version
fdrose 92be6d7
Merge branch 'main' into mabraham/eng-29561
fdrose File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ build-backend = "poetry.masonry.api" | |
|
|
||
| [tool.poetry] | ||
| name = "together" | ||
| version = "1.5.29" | ||
| version = "1.5.30" | ||
| authors = ["Together AI <[email protected]>"] | ||
| description = "Python client for Together's Cloud Platform!" | ||
| readme = "README.md" | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -182,7 +182,12 @@ def test_check_jsonl_inconsistent_dataset_format(tmp_path: Path): | |
| # Create a JSONL file with inconsistent dataset formats | ||
| file = tmp_path / "inconsistent_format.jsonl" | ||
| content = [ | ||
| {"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hi"}]}, | ||
| { | ||
| "messages": [ | ||
| {"role": "user", "content": "Hi"}, | ||
| {"role": "assistant", "content": "Hi! How can I help you?"}, | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| {"text": "How are you?"}, # Missing 'messages' | ||
| ] | ||
| with file.open("w") as f: | ||
|
|
@@ -207,7 +212,7 @@ def test_check_jsonl_invalid_role(tmp_path: Path): | |
| report = check_file(file) | ||
|
|
||
| assert not report["is_check_passed"] | ||
| assert "Found invalid role `invalid_role`" in report["message"] | ||
| assert "Invalid role `invalid_role` in conversation" in report["message"] | ||
cursor[bot] marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_check_jsonl_non_alternating_roles(tmp_path: Path): | ||
|
|
@@ -230,6 +235,22 @@ def test_check_jsonl_non_alternating_roles(tmp_path: Path): | |
| assert "Invalid role turns" in report["message"] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_check_jsonl_assistant_role_exists(tmp_path: Path): | ||
| # Create a JSONL file with no assistant role | ||
| file = tmp_path / "assistant_role_exists.jsonl" | ||
| content = [{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hi"}]}] | ||
| with file.open("w") as f: | ||
| f.write("\n".join(json.dumps(item) for item in content)) | ||
|
|
||
| report = check_file(file) | ||
|
|
||
| assert not report["is_check_passed"] | ||
| assert ( | ||
| "At least one message with the assistant role must be present" | ||
| in report["message"] | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Bug: Duplicate Test Overwrites Original CaseThe |
||
|
|
||
| def test_check_jsonl_invalid_value_type(tmp_path: Path): | ||
| # Create a JSONL file with an invalid value type | ||
| file = tmp_path / "invalid_value_type.jsonl" | ||
|
|
@@ -257,7 +278,7 @@ def test_check_jsonl_missing_field_in_conversation(tmp_path: Path): | |
|
|
||
| report = check_file(file) | ||
| assert not report["is_check_passed"] | ||
| assert "Field `content` is missing for a turn" in report["message"] | ||
| assert "Missing required column `content`" in report["message"] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_check_jsonl_wrong_turn_type(tmp_path: Path): | ||
|
|
@@ -277,7 +298,7 @@ def test_check_jsonl_wrong_turn_type(tmp_path: Path): | |
| report = check_file(file) | ||
| assert not report["is_check_passed"] | ||
| assert ( | ||
| "Invalid format on line 1 of the input file. Expected a dictionary" | ||
| "Invalid format on line 1 of the input file. The `messages` column must be a list of dicts." | ||
| in report["message"] | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -301,9 +322,7 @@ def test_check_jsonl_empty_messages(tmp_path: Path): | |
|
|
||
| report = check_file(file) | ||
| assert not report["is_check_passed"] | ||
| assert ( | ||
| "Expected a non-empty list of messages. Found empty list" in report["message"] | ||
| ) | ||
| assert "The `messages` column must not be empty" in report["message"] | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_check_jsonl_valid_weights_all_messages(tmp_path: Path): | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: Validation Checks Incomplete for Output Fields
The
validate_preference_openaifunction no longer applies comprehensivevalidate_messageschecks topreferred_outputandnon_preferred_output. These fields now only receive basic structural validation, which could allow malformed messages.