Add a string that marks inserted comments #87
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This marker is inserted immediately after the comment string. Useful if
commentary is only used to disable code (rather than inserting
explanatory comments).
For example,
let g:commentary_marker = '~'
will comment
f();
into
//~ f();
Support a b: version because some filetypes (like dosbatch or python's
black) require whitespace after their commentstring.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This marker is inserted immediately after the comment string. Useful if
commentary is only used to disable code (rather than inserting
explanatory comments).
For example,
will comment
into
I find this helps my temporarily disabled code stand out from normal comments.
This also modifies commentary's uncommenting behavior to only remove these blocks. I'm not sure that's a good thing. I don't expect you to take this PR as is, but more a question of whether something like this seems like a good inclusion.