Skip to content

service: seperate coordinator and worker service #360

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

parsa97
Copy link

@parsa97 parsa97 commented Jun 22, 2025

Fix issue #269

Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to the Trino community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. Continue to work with us on the review and improvements in this PR, and submit the signed CLA to [email protected]. Photos, scans, or digitally-signed PDF files are all suitable. Processing may take a few days. The CLA needs to be on file before we merge your changes. For more information, see https://github.com/trinodb/cla

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
{{- $coordinatorJmx := merge .Values.jmx.coordinator (omit .Values.jmx "coordinator" "worker") -}}
{{- $svc := .Values.service | default .Values.serviceCoordinator }}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we merge the coordinator service with the "general" service, like we do for JMX above?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO it's better to keep them separated, or even add a deprecation warning for Values.service.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm ok with keeping them separated, but we should make sure no values are silently ignored. So we should call fail() when using the coordinator or worker services, and there's anything set in the shared service.

@parsa97 parsa97 force-pushed the seperate-worker-coordinator-service branch from de9293c to bafdcf7 Compare June 23, 2025 09:08
Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to the Trino community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. Continue to work with us on the review and improvements in this PR, and submit the signed CLA to [email protected]. Photos, scans, or digitally-signed PDF files are all suitable. Processing may take a few days. The CLA needs to be on file before we merge your changes. For more information, see https://github.com/trinodb/cla

@parsa97 parsa97 force-pushed the seperate-worker-coordinator-service branch from bafdcf7 to 1d8c734 Compare June 23, 2025 09:14
Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to the Trino community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. Continue to work with us on the review and improvements in this PR, and submit the signed CLA to [email protected]. Photos, scans, or digitally-signed PDF files are all suitable. Processing may take a few days. The CLA needs to be on file before we merge your changes. For more information, see https://github.com/trinodb/cla

@nineinchnick
Copy link
Member

@cla-bot check

Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to the Trino community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. Continue to work with us on the review and improvements in this PR, and submit the signed CLA to [email protected]. Photos, scans, or digitally-signed PDF files are all suitable. Processing may take a few days. The CLA needs to be on file before we merge your changes. For more information, see https://github.com/trinodb/cla

Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 21, 2025

The cla-bot has been summoned, and re-checked this pull request!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants