feat(sambanova): update model YAMLs [bot]

[models-bot]

Auto-generated by poc-agent for provider sambanova.

---

Note

Low Risk
Metadata-only pricing and documentation link updates with no runtime or auth changes.

Overview
Updates SambaNova catalog metadata for gemma-4-31B-it.

Pricing per-token costs are raised: input 2.2e-7 → 3.8e-7, output 5.9e-7 → 1.15e-6 (region * unchanged).

Sources now cite SambaNova docs for the models list plus vision, video, and prompt-caching (in addition to existing function-calling). No changes to modalities, limits, or other model flags in this diff.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5e05eff. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

/test-models

[harshiv-26]

Gateway test results

• Total: 4
• Passed: 2
• Failed: 0
• Validation failed: 2
• Errored: 0
• Skipped: 0
• Success rate: 50.0%

Provider	Model	Scenarios
sambanova	gemma-4-31B-it	success: params:stream, params validation_failure: reasoning, reasoning:stream

Failures (2)

sambanova/gemma-4-31B-it — reasoning (validation_failure)

Error

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/tmp6kdgv5r5/snippet.py", line 39, in <module>
    raise Exception("VALIDATION FAILED: reasoning - no reasoning information in response")
Exception: VALIDATION FAILED: reasoning - no reasoning information in response

Code snippet

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(api_key="***", base_url="https://internal.devtest.truefoundry.tech/api/llm")

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="test-v2-sambanova/gemma-4-31B-it",
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "How to calculate 3^3^3^3? Think step by step and show all reasoning."},
    ],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
    stream=False,
)
_usage = getattr(response, "usage", None)
_reasoning_detected = False

_choices = getattr(response, "choices", None)
if _choices and len(_choices) > 0:
    _message = getattr(_choices[0], "message", None)
else:
    _message = None

if _message and getattr(_message, "content", None) is not None:
    print(_message.content)

if _usage is not None:
    _output_token_details = getattr(_usage, "completion_tokens_details", None)
    if _output_token_details and getattr(_output_token_details, "reasoning_tokens", 0) > 0:
        _reasoning_detected = True
    elif getattr(_usage, "reasoning", None) is not None:
        _reasoning_detected = True

if getattr(_message, "reasoning_content", None) is not None:
    _reasoning_detected = True
elif getattr(_message, "reasoning", None) is not None:
    _reasoning_detected = True

if not _reasoning_detected:
    print("Response: ", response)
    raise Exception("VALIDATION FAILED: reasoning - no reasoning information in response")
print("VALIDATION: reasoning SUCCESS")

Output

To calculate an expression like $3^{3^{3^3}}$, we must follow the mathematical convention for **tetration** (repeated exponentiation). 

### Step 1: Determine the Order of Operations
In mathematics, when exponents are stacked without parentheses, they are evaluated from **top to bottom** (right-associative). 

The expression is interpreted as:
$$3^{(3^{(3^3)})}$$

If we calculated from the bottom up, the number would be significantly smaller. By calculating from the top down, the number grows at an astronomical rate.

---

### Step 2: Solve the First Level (The Top)
We start with the highest exponent:
$$3^3 = 3 \times 3 \times 3 = 27$$

Now, we substitute this back into the expression:
$$3^{3^{27}}$$

---

### Step 3: Solve the Second Level
Now we must calculate $3^{27}$. This is a large number, but manageable with a calculator:
$$3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987$$

Now, we substitute this result back into the base:
$$3^{7,625,597,484,987}$$

---

### Step 4: Analyze the Final Result
The final step is to calculate $3$ raised to the power of $7.6$ trillion. 

**Can we write this as a standard number?**
No. To understand why, let's look at the number of digits this number would have. The number of digits in $x$ is roughly $\log_{10}(x)$.

$$\text{Number of digits} \approx \log_{10}(3^{7,625,597,484,987})$$
$$\text{Number of digits} \approx 7,625,597,484,987 \times \log_{10}(3)$$
$$\text{Number of digits} \approx 7,625,597,484,987 \times 0.4771$$
$$\text{Number of digits} \approx 3,638,334,640,024$$

The resulting number has approximately **3.6 trillion digits**. 

To put this in perspective:
*   If you printed this number in standard font on A4 paper, the paper trail would stretch for millions of miles.
*   There is not enough digital storage on a standard consumer hard drive to save this number as a text file.

### Final Answer:
The expression $3^{3^{3^3}}$ is equal to **$3^{7,625,597,484,987}$**. 

It is a number so large that it cannot be written in decimal form, but it is represented in tetration notation as $^4 3$.
Response:  ChatCompletion(id='8c31d055-fda6-4620-84c6-d8053a74323d', choices=[Choice(finish_reason='stop', index=0, logprobs=None, message=ChatCompletionMessage(content="To calculate an expression like $3^{3^{3^3}}$, we must follow the mathematical convention for **tetration** (repeated exponentiation). \n\n### Step 1: Determine the Order of Operations\nIn mathematics, when exponents are stacked without parentheses, they are evaluated from **top to bottom** (right-associative). \n\nThe expression is interpreted as:\n$$3^{(3^{(3^3)})}$$\n\nIf we calculated from the bottom up, the number would be significantly smaller. By calculating from the top down, the number grows at an astronomical rate.\n\n---\n\n### Step 2: Solve the First Level (The Top)\nWe start with the highest exponent:\n$$3^3 = 3 \\times 3 \\times 3 = 27$$\n\nNow, we substitute this back into the expression:\n$$3^{3^{27}}$$\n\n---\n\n### Step 3: Solve the Second Level\nNow we must calculate $3^{27}$. This is a large number, but manageable with a calculator:\n$$3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987$$\n\nNow, we substitute this result back into the base:\n$$3^{7,625,597,484,987}$$\n\n---\n\n### Step 4: Analyze the Final Result\nThe final step is to calculate $3$ raised to the power of $7.6$ trillion. \n\n**Can we write this as a standard number?**\nNo. To understand why, let's look at the number of digits this number would have. The number of digits in $x$ is roughly $\\log_{10}(x)$.\n\n$$\\text{Number of digits} \\approx \\log_{10}(3^{7,625,597,484,987})$$\n$$\\text{Number of digits} \\approx 7,625,597,484,987 \\times \\log_{10}(3)$$\n$$\\text{Number of digits} \\approx 7,625,597,484,987 \\times 0.4771$$\n$$\\text{Number of digits} \\approx 3,638,334,640,024$$\n\nThe resulting number has approximately **3.6 trillion digits**. \n\nTo put this in perspective:\n*   If you printed this number in standard font on A4 paper, the paper trail would stretch for millions of miles.\n*   There is not enough digital storage on a standard consumer hard drive to save this number as a text file.\n\n### Final Answer:\nThe expression $3^{3^{3^3}}$ is equal to **$3^{7,625,597,484,987}$**. \n\nIt is a number so large that it cannot be written in decimal form, but it is represented in tetration notation as $^4 3$.", refusal=None, role='assistant', annotations=None, audio=None, function_call=None, tool_calls=None))], created=1786366537, model='gemma-4-31B-it', object='chat.completion', service_tier=None, system_fingerprint='fastcoe', usage=CompletionUsage(completion_tokens=653, prompt_tokens=35, total_tokens=688, completion_tokens_details=None, prompt_tokens_details=None), provider='sambanova')

sambanova/gemma-4-31B-it — reasoning:stream (validation_failure)

Error

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/tmpi6ty7wqu/snippet.py", line 31, in <module>
    raise Exception("VALIDATION FAILED: reasoning stream - no reasoning information in stream")
Exception: VALIDATION FAILED: reasoning stream - no reasoning information in stream

Code snippet

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(api_key="***", base_url="https://internal.devtest.truefoundry.tech/api/llm")

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="test-v2-sambanova/gemma-4-31B-it",
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "How to calculate 3^3^3^3? Think step by step and show all reasoning."},
    ],
    reasoning_effort="medium",
    stream=True,
)
_reasoning_detected = False
for chunk in response:
    if chunk.choices and len(chunk.choices) > 0:
        delta = chunk.choices[0].delta
        if delta.content is not None:
            print(delta.content, end="", flush=True)
        if getattr(delta, "reasoning_content", None) is not None:
            _reasoning_detected = True
        if getattr(delta, "reasoning", None) is not None:
            _reasoning_detected = True

    _usage = getattr(chunk, "usage", None)
    if _usage is not None:
        _details = getattr(_usage, "completion_tokens_details", None)
        if _details and getattr(_details, "reasoning_tokens", 0) > 0:
            _reasoning_detected = True

if not _reasoning_detected:
    raise Exception("VALIDATION FAILED: reasoning stream - no reasoning information in stream")
print("\nVALIDATION: reasoning stream SUCCESS")

Output

To calculate an expression like $3^{3^{3^3}}$, we must follow the mathematical convention for **tetration** (repeated exponentiation). 

### Step 1: Determine the Order of Operations
In mathematics, when exponents are stacked without parentheses, they are evaluated from **top to bottom** (right-associative). 

The expression is interpreted as:
$$3^{(3^{(3^3)})}$$

If we calculated from the bottom up, the number would be significantly smaller. By calculating from the top down, the number grows at an astronomical rate.

---

### Step 2: Solve the First Level (The Top)
We start with the highest exponent:
$$3^3 = 3 \times 3 \times 3 = 27$$

Now, we substitute this back into the expression:
$$3^{3^{27}}$$

---

### Step 3: Solve the Second Level
Now we must calculate $3^{27}$. This is a large number, but manageable with a calculator:
$$3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987$$

Now, we substitute this result back into the base:
$$3^{7,625,597,484,987}$$

---

### Step 4: Analyze the Final Result
The final step is to calculate $3$ raised to the power of $7.6$ trillion. 

**Can we write this as a standard number?**
No. To understand why, let's look at the number of digits this number would have. The number of digits in $x$ is roughly $\log_{10}(x)$.

$$\text{Number of digits} \approx \log_{10}(3^{7,625,597,484,987})$$
$$\text{Number of digits} \approx 7,625,597,484,987 \times \log_{10}(3)$$
$$\text{Number of digits} \approx 7,625,597,484,987 \times 0.4771$$
$$\text{Number of digits} \approx 3,638,334,640,024$$

The resulting number has approximately **3.6 trillion digits**. 

To put this in perspective:
*   If you printed this number in standard font on A4 paper, the paper trail would stretch for millions of miles.
*   There is not enough digital storage on a standard consumer hard drive to save this number as a text file.

### Final Answer:
The expression $3^{3^{3^3}}$ is equal to **$3^{7,625,597,484,987}$**. 

It is a number so large that it cannot be written in decimal form, but it is represented in tetration notation as $^4 3$.

Successes (2)

sambanova/gemma-4-31B-it — params:stream (success)

Output

The capital of France is Paris.

sambanova/gemma-4-31B-it — params (success)

Output

The capital of France is Paris.

[LordGameleo]

~73-95% price increase on gemma-4-31B-it — please verify against SambaNova's published pricing page.