Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Docs] Remove some unnecessary Twitter references/examples #41174

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member

@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke commented Jan 23, 2025

Description

Remove some unnecessary Twitter references/examples

Motivation & Context

Unnecessarily dated, and not the best reputation in recent years.

Type of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guidelines
  • My code follows the code style of the project (using npm run lint)
  • My change introduces changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed

Live previews

Related issues

@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke requested a review from mdo January 23, 2025 21:13
@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member Author

I'd actually suggest going much further (removing links to @mdo, @fat, @getbootstrap), but for now this is a start

@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke requested a review from mdo January 24, 2025 23:54
@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke force-pushed the remove-unnecessary-twitter-references branch 2 times, most recently from e35bd1c to 58eb364 Compare January 25, 2025 00:03
@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke force-pushed the remove-unnecessary-twitter-references branch from 58eb364 to b32a5c8 Compare January 25, 2025 00:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Review in progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants