Skip to content

eospilot/eulake configuration documentation #308

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

garciagenrique
Copy link
Member

@garciagenrique garciagenrique commented Jan 30, 2025

add README (and some snippets to be double checked) with the configuration of the eospilot deployment.

TODO

Soap2G and others added 25 commits December 5, 2024 15:22
I promise I'll fix this
* Conditional poststarthook creation

* adding env var check
* add python3.11.8 default ima

* fix CI unchecked
* add rucio-iam-connected-client pod

* fix st***d tf tests

* fix rucio-noise cronjobs and add rucio-noise-test-pod

* upgrade FTS server of rucio daemons

* update rucio-noise-pod-and-rucio-ewpc01

* Update infrastructure/cluster/flux/rucio/rucio-cronjobs.yaml

---------

Co-authored-by: Giovanni Guerrieri <[email protected]>
* forgot to end if in produce_noise.sh

* please test your code begore pushing -.-
@garciagenrique garciagenrique requested a review from Soap2G January 30, 2025 11:35
garciagenrique and others added 2 commits January 30, 2025 12:43
* add ingress for CERN prometheus configuration

* update path and merge main

* fix conflicts
@garciagenrique
Copy link
Member Author

@Soap2G the status missing can be ignored

Copy link
Contributor

@Soap2G Soap2G left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, but do we want to address the todo, or do we just merge?

@garciagenrique
Copy link
Member Author

Looks good to me, but do we want to address the todo, or do we just merge?

I can take care of this (recent on my mind), so maybe we can leave it open until I implement it

@garciagenrique garciagenrique force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from f05cc76 to 4c0c399 Compare April 14, 2025 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants