Skip to content

Check prev/next links in Content Documents (issue #975)#1037

Open
GrayWolfMT wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
issue/975
Open

Check prev/next links in Content Documents (issue #975)#1037
GrayWolfMT wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
issue/975

Conversation

@GrayWolfMT
Copy link
Collaborator

Added checks for Link elements with "rel" attributes of "prev" and "next". The checks test for the existence of the referenced objects within the ePub. Checks ensure that the referenced files exist, that they are not remote resources, and whether they match the spine sequence.

@rdeltour rdeltour self-assigned this Feb 24, 2021
@rdeltour rdeltour self-requested a review February 24, 2021 15:01
@rdeltour rdeltour added spec: EPUB 3.x Impacting the support of EPUB 3.x specifications status: in progress The issue is being implemented by the development team labels Feb 24, 2021
@rdeltour
Copy link
Member

This PR needs to be rebased, reviewed, and tests ported to the new test framework. Assigning it to me for v4.2.6 (tentatively).

@rdeltour rdeltour added this to the v4.2.6 milestone Feb 24, 2021
@rdeltour rdeltour changed the title Issue/975 Checks prev/next links in Content Documents (issue #975) Feb 24, 2021
@rdeltour rdeltour changed the title Checks prev/next links in Content Documents (issue #975) Check prev/next links in Content Documents (issue #975) Feb 24, 2021
@rdeltour rdeltour modified the milestones: v4.2.7, v5.0.0 Nov 12, 2021
@rdeltour rdeltour modified the milestones: v5.0.0, v5.0.0-rc Dec 8, 2022
@rdeltour rdeltour added status: stalled The issue has been inactive for a while and removed status: in progress The issue is being implemented by the development team labels Jan 11, 2023
@rdeltour rdeltour removed this from the v5.0.0-rc milestone Jan 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

spec: EPUB 3.x Impacting the support of EPUB 3.x specifications status: stalled The issue has been inactive for a while

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants