Skip to content

Amend process definition to remove registration example #3538

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member

@patrickhlauke patrickhlauke commented Nov 7, 2023

As "process" is now referred to from the new 3.3.8/3.3.9 Authentication SCs, and these SCs are scoped to "authentication" only (rather than "registration"), the current definition causes confusion/a non-sequitur. see #3264 (comment)


Preview | Diff

As "process" is now referred to from the new 3.3.8/3.3.9 Authentication SCs, and these SCs are scoped to "authentication" only (rather than "registration"), the current definition causes confusion/a non-sequitur. see #3264 (comment)
@bruce-usab
Copy link
Contributor

bruce-usab commented Nov 14, 2023

I agree it would have been better to have authentication as an example of a process (as compared to account registration). That said, I am not enthusiastic about including this as an erratum (since it is normative). It is not wrong that account registration is an example of a process.

@patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member Author

it causes real confusion for the already confusing "accessible authentication" concepts. and while yes, it's a change to a normative part, it only changes the non-exhaustive examples within the definition

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants