Skip to content

Conversation

naduni-s
Copy link

@naduni-s naduni-s commented Sep 4, 2025

Purpose

Fixes several typos, and a Log4j2 property key in the HashiCorp Vault integration documentation.

Goals

Correct spelling mistakes (“Intergrate” → “Integrate”, “Hashicrop” → “HashiCorp”, “methords” → “methods”, “requirment” → “requirement”).

Fix Log4j2 property syntax:
logger.org-wso2-carbon-securevault-hashicorp.appenderRefCARBON_CONSOLE.ref
→ logger.org-wso2-carbon-securevault-hashicorp.appenderRef.CARBON_CONSOLE.ref

Approach

Edited the Markdown file:
en/docs/install-and-setup/setup/security/logins-and-passwords/harshicrop-vault-extension.md
Applied the corrections directly to the text and configuration examples.
No UI changes; no screenshots required.

User stories

As a developer, I want the documentation to be accurate, so I can set up HashiCorp Vault integration without confusion or errors.>

Release note

Fixes typos and configuration instructions in the HashiCorp Vault integration documentation page.

Documentation

This PR updates the official WSO2 API Manager docs: [https://apim.docs.wso2.com/en/latest/install-and-setup/setup/security/logins-and-passwords/harshicrop-vault-extension/]

Training

N/A – no training content affected.

Certification

N/A – no certification impact.

Marketing

N/A – no marketing content affected.

Automation tests

  • Unit tests

    N/A

  • Integration tests

    N/A

Security checks

Samples

N/A

Related PRs

N/A

Migrations (if applicable)

N/A

Test environment

Not applicable – documentation-only change.

Learning

Verified spelling and configuration with official WSO2 guides.
Checked Log4j2 syntax against working APIM setup to ensure correctness.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Sep 4, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@tharikaGitHub
Copy link
Member

Hi @naduni-s,

Will you be able to add this change to the other applicable doc spaces as well? We have separate doc space branches for different APIM versions.

Thanks,
Tharika.

@naduni-s
Copy link
Author

naduni-s commented Sep 5, 2025

Hi @tharikaGitHub ,
Thanks for the feedback! I will apply the same changes to the other versioned doc branches and create separate PRs for them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants