- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 42
Facetgrid #83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Facetgrid #83
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Deepak Cherian <[email protected]>
Update from upstream
| Codecov Report
 @@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #83   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.12%   92.12%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         800      800           
=======================================
  Hits          737      737           
  Misses         63       63           
 Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 
 Continue to review full report at Codecov. 
 | 
| Julia, I think the issue may be the  cf-xarray/cf_xarray/accessor.py Lines 530 to 531 in 19d80cf 
 EDIT: I don't actually remember why this was added. Set to True by default and see if tests pass? | 
| Codecov Report
 
 @@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #83      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.39%   96.38%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        1635     1631       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         1576     1572       -4     
  Misses         59       59              
 Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 
 Continue to review full report at Codecov. 
 | 
| This test should be changed; we aren't returning pure FacetGrid instances anymore. | 
| 
 That makes sense. I'm not 100% sure what the instances should be yet so I won't change it - at least until I have it working locally. | 
| We can just delete that line and make sure that plotting followed by  | 
| 
 There are 3 lines identical to that (on 298, 302, and 312). Should we delete each of these tests? | 
| yes unless you have ideas for something to test. | 
* main: (57 commits) Add CITATION.cff, tributors, zenodo.json (xarray-contrib#231) Add zenodo badge Improve `rename_like` (xarray-contrib#222) Don't apply mappers to DataArrays (xarray-contrib#227) Add unit support to cf-xarray (xarray-contrib#197) Update README.rst Add earthcube 2021 notebook link to readme v0.5.2 Some CMIP6 support Add pooch to binder environment (xarray-contrib#223) `add_bounds` uses `keys` rather than `dims` (xarray-contrib#221) Add .cf.formula_terms (xarray-contrib#213) Update whats-new.rst (xarray-contrib#217) add bounds property (xarray-contrib#214) Update some tests. Compile regexes Fix black Add __version__ (xarray-contrib#208) add skip to rename_like (xarray-contrib#206) Refactor out coordinate criteria to criteria.py (xarray-contrib#205) ...
Address #79