Skip to content

Conversation

@aescolar
Copy link
Member

Following the discussions in the process working group on 2025/10/08 & 2025/10/22.
Clarify the "status" key/field definition:
With the current definitions of maintained and odd-fixes we ended up equating these with having or not somebody listed in the "maintainers" key.
Let's instead change the definition to indicate how actively the area is maintained, and to encourage people to step up in areas where we lack bandwidth.

Following the discussions in the process working group on 2025/10/08
& 2025/10/22.
Clarify the "status" key/field definition:
With the current definitions of maintained and odd-fixes we ended up
equating these with having or not somebody listed in the "maintainers"
key.
Let's instead change the definition to indicate how actively the area
is maintained, and to encourage people to step up in areas where we
lack bandwidth.

Signed-off-by: Alberto Escolar Piedras <[email protected]>
@aescolar aescolar marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 13:04
@aescolar aescolar added the Process Tracked by the process WG label Oct 27, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To do in Process Oct 27, 2025
@zephyrbot zephyrbot requested a review from stephanosio October 27, 2025 13:06
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area: MAINTAINER File Process Tracked by the process WG

Projects

Status: To do

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants