Skip to content

Conversation

@taegyunkim
Copy link
Collaborator

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

confluent-kafka==2.11.1
cryptography==45.0.6
ddtrace==3.12.5
ddtrace@ {root:uri}/ddtrace-3.17.0.dev73+g11a526fe2-cp313-cp313-manylinux2014_x86_64.manylinux_2_17_x86_64.whl

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Avoid hard-coding a local Linux wheel for ddtrace

Both dependency lists now point to ddtrace @ {root:uri}/ddtrace-3.17.0.dev73+g11a526fe2-cp313-cp313-manylinux2014_x86_64.manylinux_2_17_x86_64.whl. This direct reference requires a wheel sitting at the repository root and is built only for Linux/x86‑64 CPython 3.13. On any other platform—or if the wheel is not checked into the repo—pip will immediately fail to resolve ddtrace, so building or testing the agent from source outside that single environment is no longer possible. Unless the project intends to ship a platform-specific wheel in-tree, this should remain a normal version pin to a published package.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.39%. Comparing base (46169ca) to head (5ec602f).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Test Results

   686 files     686 suites   5h 0m 10s ⏱️
 8 264 tests  8 127 ✅   132 💤 1 ❌ 4 🔥
30 985 runs  27 023 ✅ 3 957 💤 1 ❌ 4 🔥

For more details on these failures and errors, see this check.

Results for commit 5ec602f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant