-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
restore invited login when OpenReport settles the participant without one #95594
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b1b43ae
restore invited login when OpenReport settles the participant without…
mukhrr 4f380cb
fixed spell fail
mukhrr b0e9546
added missing Openreport tests
mukhrr 2f7ddda
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into fix/92581
mukhrr be792a8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into fix/92581
mukhrr bf2b0d8
fix eslint errors: no-base-to-string on emailList and unsafe Mock ass…
mukhrr 93a3d4f
scope the empty-login sanitizer to OpenPublicProfilePage
mukhrr 12e86b5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into fix/92581
mukhrr e725a88
respect empty login
mukhrr 89eaf61
restore only when the login key is missing
mukhrr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem correct to me. They are distinguishable by checking whether the login key exists. You should use
!Object.hasOwn(personalDetail, 'login')instead of!personalDetails[accountID].login.The point is
login: ''can be intentional, so we should not treat it as missing or delete it from responses. Please apply the same “missing key only” rule to theOpenPublicProfilePagehandling.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm yes that makes sense to me. thanks