Skip to content

Prepare the Heartwood 0.2.0 Release - #92

Merged
PSchmiedmayer merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/stable-release-assurance
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

Prepare the Heartwood 0.2.0 Release#92
PSchmiedmayer merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/stable-release-assurance

Conversation

@PSchmiedmayer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

♻️ Current situation & Problem

Heartwood needs enforceable mitigations for the remaining GPU runtime advisories and a clear support and security policy before the first stable 0.2 release. This advances #34 and #48.

⚙️ Release Notes

  • Disable vLLM's optional outlines disk cache and reject packaged vLLM TorchScript use.
  • Keep runtime caches private and define current support, compatibility, security-reporting, and release ownership policies.
  • Promote release-owned metadata, artifacts, dependencies, and documentation to 0.2.0.

📚 Documentation

Adds the repository security policy and Support and Compatibility guide, and updates stable release and platform references for 0.2.0.

✅ Testing

Python, web unit and browser tests, gateway and notebook smoke tests, strict documentation build, REUSE, release version gate, native installer suite, and clean Ubuntu 24.04 installation and inference smoke.

Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 24, 2026 00:23
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Backlog in Heartwood Jul 24, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@PSchmiedmayer, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 50 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 14526679-5df2-4079-8fe0-d9246352f8a1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 628a95f and 71b313c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • images/gpu/verify_vllm.py
  • packages/compliance/tests/test_container_assets.py
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The release is finalized as version 0.2.0 across project metadata, packages, fixtures, skills, container builds, installers, and documentation. New support, compatibility, security, and release-governance guidance is linked into project documentation. GPU runtime images now disable vLLM’s outlines disk cache and reject prohibited cache or TorchScript configurations through startup verification. Compliance tests cover the updated release and runtime contracts.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant GPU Launcher
  participant vLLM
  participant Verifier
  GPU Launcher->>vLLM: Set outlines disk cache disabled
  GPU Launcher->>Verifier: Run startup checks
  Verifier->>vLLM: Inspect environment and package sources
  vLLM-->>Verifier: Return configuration and source files
  Verifier-->>GPU Launcher: Permit startup or raise RuntimeError
Loading

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 23.08% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: preparing Heartwood 0.2.0 for release.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the release-prep changes, policy updates, and mitigations in the PR.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@images/gpu/verify_vllm.py`:
- Around line 106-137: Update _torchscript_calls to recognize ast.Import entries
for torch.jit, adding each alias (including asname) to jit_names so calls such
as jit.script(...) are detected. Preserve existing from torch import jit and
torch.jit.script handling, and add a regression test covering import torch.jit
as jit followed by jit.script(...).

In `@SECURITY.md`:
- Line 3: Update the SPDX copyright attribution in SECURITY.md at lines 3-3 and
documentation/operate/support.md at lines 3-3 to use the approved Schmiedmayer
Lab at Stanford University wording, replacing the broader Stanford University
attribution in both headers.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 718b1b2f-3e05-4daa-b4df-a2f1d312b553

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 886ba53 and 628a95f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • packages/webui/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
  • uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (56)
  • AGENTS.md
  • README.md
  • SECURITY.md
  • VERSION.toml
  • docker-bake.hcl
  • documentation/contribute/releases.md
  • documentation/models/offline.md
  • documentation/operate/index.md
  • documentation/operate/security.md
  • documentation/operate/support.md
  • documentation/platforms/carina.md
  • documentation/platforms/containers.md
  • documentation/platforms/native-linux.md
  • documentation/platforms/terra.md
  • fixtures/synthetic/skills/omop-cohort-summary/SKILL.md
  • fixtures/synthetic/skills/omop-cohort-summary/metadata.json
  • images/Dockerfile
  • images/gpu/heartwood-vllm
  • images/gpu/verify_vllm.py
  • packages/adapters/pyproject.toml
  • packages/adapters/src/heartwood/adapters/__init__.py
  • packages/adapters/src/heartwood/adapters/conformance.py
  • packages/adapters/tests/test_conformance.py
  • packages/audit/pyproject.toml
  • packages/audit/src/heartwood/audit/__init__.py
  • packages/cli/pyproject.toml
  • packages/cli/src/heartwood/cli/__init__.py
  • packages/compliance/pyproject.toml
  • packages/compliance/src/heartwood/compliance/__init__.py
  • packages/compliance/tests/test_container_assets.py
  • packages/compliance/tests/test_release_governance.py
  • packages/core-adapter/pyproject.toml
  • packages/core-adapter/src/heartwood/core_adapter/__init__.py
  • packages/detector/pyproject.toml
  • packages/detector/src/heartwood/detector/__init__.py
  • packages/fixtures/pyproject.toml
  • packages/fixtures/src/heartwood/fixtures/__init__.py
  • packages/gateway/pyproject.toml
  • packages/model-policy/pyproject.toml
  • packages/model-policy/src/heartwood/model_policy/__init__.py
  • packages/notebook/pyproject.toml
  • packages/notebook/src/heartwood/notebook/__init__.py
  • packages/schemas/pyproject.toml
  • packages/schemas/src/heartwood/schemas/__init__.py
  • packages/schemas/tests/test_schema_records.py
  • packages/session/pyproject.toml
  • packages/session/src/heartwood/session/__init__.py
  • packages/skills/pyproject.toml
  • packages/webui/package.json
  • skills/verified/aggregate-export/SKILL.md
  • skills/verified/aggregate-export/metadata.json
  • skills/verified/baseline-model/SKILL.md
  • skills/verified/baseline-model/metadata.json
  • skills/verified/omop-cohort-summary/SKILL.md
  • skills/verified/omop-cohort-summary/metadata.json
  • zensical.toml

Comment thread images/gpu/verify_vllm.py
Comment thread SECURITY.md
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 24, 2026 00:32

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@PSchmiedmayer
PSchmiedmayer merged commit 137fe77 into main Jul 24, 2026
22 checks passed
@PSchmiedmayer
PSchmiedmayer deleted the feature/stable-release-assurance branch July 24, 2026 00:38
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Backlog to Done in Heartwood Jul 24, 2026
@PSchmiedmayer PSchmiedmayer self-assigned this Jul 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants