Skip to content

Conversation

urfeex
Copy link
Member

@urfeex urfeex commented Jul 16, 2025

The script command has been renamed in the controller.

@urfeex urfeex requested a review from a team July 16, 2025 07:19
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (torque_control@b1036b5). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             torque_control     #362   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?   76.76%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?       92           
  Lines                     ?     4218           
  Branches                  ?      459           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?     3238           
  Misses                    ?      746           
  Partials                  ?      234           
Flag Coverage Δ
start_ursim 82.70% <ø> (?)
ur20-latest 74.59% <ø> (?)
ur5-3.14.3 74.85% <ø> (?)
ur5e-10.7.0 69.76% <ø> (?)
ur5e-5.9.4 74.70% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@URJala URJala self-requested a review July 30, 2025 12:43
@urfeex
Copy link
Member Author

urfeex commented Jul 30, 2025

I'm not sure whether that change as made it to the PolyScope 5 Beta program, so I'm a bit hesitating on merging this.

@urfeex
Copy link
Member Author

urfeex commented Sep 2, 2025

Ready to merge this now.

The script command has been renamed in the controller.
@urfeex urfeex force-pushed the rename_torque_command branch from d9cc099 to ed66a7a Compare September 2, 2025 07:07
@urfeex urfeex requested a review from URJala September 3, 2025 08:08
direct_torque is only available from 10.11 on.
On a simulated robot, torque_control commands don't have any effect. As
a result, the torque_control example runs forever when being run on a
simulated robot.
This commit makes it use the second argument as a timeout after which
the example is stopped. If the timeout is hit, it will print a warning
stating that this is expected on a simulated robot.

This should make the behavior similar to the other examples and make the
CI run with that example.
Now that 5.23.0 is released, we can increase the version requirement
properly.
@urfeex urfeex force-pushed the rename_torque_command branch from 577b587 to 0f2424a Compare September 4, 2025 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants