Skip to content

Update custom_ops.py #315

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update custom_ops.py #315

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kmulderdas
Copy link

Small compatibility change which disables jitting on the s2fft side, in turn enables higher level jitting in s2ai.

Small compatibility change which disables jitting on the s2fft side, in turn enables higher level jitting in s2ai.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.50%. Comparing base (d77e9cb) to head (7048633).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #315      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.51%   96.50%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        3439     3436       -3     
==========================================
- Hits         3319     3316       -3     
  Misses        120      120              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@matt-graham matt-graham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kmulderdas - is having these functions jitted blocking you jitting a function which calls them in s2ai? Generally jax.jit wrapped functions should be able to be arbitrarily nested and there is some suggestion it can help with compilation times when a lower-level function is reused multiple times in a higher level function. I suspect removing the jit decorators on the utility functions here won't have any major performance implications but it would be good to understand why its causing issues as we widely apply jax.jit to other functions in s2fft which are likely to be contained in higher-level jitted functions.

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ def wigner_subset_to_s2(
return np.fft.ifft(x, axis=-2, norm="forward")


@partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4))
# @partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# @partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4))

We generally shouldn't comment out code as we can always recover snippets from git history - this is likely to be what is causing the linting failures.

@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ def so3_to_wigner_subset(
return s2_to_wigner_subset(x, spins, DW, L, sampling)


@partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4, 5))
# @partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4, 5))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# @partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4, 5))

@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ def s2_to_wigner_subset(
return x * (2.0 * np.pi) ** 2


@partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4))
# @partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# @partial(jit, static_argnums=(3, 4))

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants