Conversation
…fa_NN.tex (34 files) [agent=perplexity-computer-phase1] Phase 1 UNIFY · trios#380 task 1.2. Pure git-mv rename: each docs/phd/chapters/NN-<slug>.tex moves to docs/phd/chapters/fa_NN.tex with 100% file similarity (R == 100). No content edits in this commit; the rename is paired 1:1 with main.tex include-path patches in the next commit. Why: per #380 manifest task 1.2, the named-strand canonical namespace is fa_NN (Flos Aureus), parallel to the ch_NN namespace (Trinity S³AI). phd-chapter-author v1.1 lessons-learned point 1 already classified the old NN-slug names as the canonical chapter location, but the v6.2 manifest reserves the unprefixed NN-slug namespace and instead pins fa_NN as the namespace shared by main.tex include lines and Neon ssot.chapters export targets. Mechanical mapping (NN preserved, slug dropped): 00-monad.tex -> fa_00.tex 01-golden-egg.tex -> fa_01.tex ... 33-epilogue.tex -> fa_33.tex Anchor phi^2 + phi^{-2} = 3 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877. Refs trios#380 Phase 1 UNIFY task 1.2.
…a_NN [agent=perplexity-computer-phase1]
Phase 1 UNIFY · trios#380 task 1.2 (paired with previous 34-file
git-mv commit).
Patches:
- docs/phd/main.tex line 299..353: 34 \include{chapters/NN-slug}
-> \include{chapters/fa_NN}. The Trinity S³AI strand
(\include{chapters/ch_00..ch_34}, lines 357..391) is unchanged.
- docs/phd/main_ru.tex: same 34 substitutions.
Verification:
- grep -cE "chapters/fa_" main.tex == 34 (target)
- grep -cE "chapters/ch_" main.tex == 35 (preserved Trinity S³AI)
- grep -cE "chapters/[0-9]{2}-" main.tex == 0 (no stale refs)
- repo-wide grep across .rs/.toml/.ts/.py/.yml/.yaml/.json for
"chapters/NN-slug.tex" returns 0 hits.
- tools/citetheorem_audit/src/lib.rs uses bare "NN-slug.tex" strings
inside #[cfg(test)] tempdir-scoped tests; those names are
test-data only and do not reach the real chapters directory, so
they remain untouched (out of scope for task 1.2 — the test data
set will be revisited in task 1.5 cross-reference sweep).
Anchor phi^2 + phi^{-2} = 3 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877.
Refs trios#380 Phase 1 UNIFY task 1.2.
…; eliminate LaTeX duplicate-label warnings [agent=phase1-unify-1-5]
Phase 1 UNIFY · trios#380 task 1.5 — cross-references sweep.
Problem: 70 chapter files in docs/phd/chapters/ (34 ch_NN + 35 fa_NN +
ch_35_mesh_node) defined ~126 label keys identically across multiple
files (e.g. \label{abstract}, \label{introduction}, \label{sec:05-intro}).
None of these duplicate keys were consumed by any \ref/\autoref/\eqref/
\Cref/\pageref in the corpus, so they were pure LaTeX duplicate-label
warnings — not broken cross-references. Still, they bloated the build log
and made the PDF build noisy on the road to defense 2026-06-15.
Fix: for every \label{KEY} in <stem>.tex, if KEY is consumed by any
\ref-family command anywhere in docs/phd/, leave it bare (protected);
otherwise rewrite to \label{<stem>:KEY}. Idempotent: skip keys already
prefixed. Mechanical rename, no semantic content changed.
Inventory before patch:
- 1145 total \label sites, 620 unique keys
- 126 duplicate keys (all unreferenced)
- 119 referenced keys (all uniquely defined, 0 dangling)
Inventory after patch:
- 1145 total \label sites, 1145 unique keys
- 0 duplicate keys
- 0 dangling refs
- 119/119 originally-referenced keys still resolve (no breakage)
Patched 1011 \label sites across 70 files. Added
docs/phd/cross-ref-audit.md with full label→file map (1324 lines)
satisfying acceptance criterion #1 of #380 task 1.5.
Stacked on feat/phd-phase1-unify-1-2 (PR #595, task 1.2).
Skill: phd-chapter-author v1.1 + phd-monograph-auditor v1.2.
Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877.
R1 (no .py/.sh committed): the patch script ran from /tmp, only LaTeX changed.
…els in appendix F [agent=phase1-unify-1-6]
Phase 1 UNIFY · trios#380 task 1.6 — \citetheorem{INV-k} resolution through AP.F.
Problem: chapters cite Coq invariants "INV-k" as bare text or with the
ad-hoc stub \citetheorem already present only in defense/slides.tex
(\newcommand{\citetheorem}[1]{[\textsc{#1}]}). No corpus-wide robust
hyperref existed and appendix F-coq-citation-map.tex carried no
\label{thm:INV-k} anchors, so cross-references between body and the
canonical Coq citation map were dead text.
Fix: define \citetheorem{INV-k} as a single \providecommand in main.tex
and main_ru.tex that hyperrefs into appendix F via \label{thm:INV-k}.
Add \label{thm:INV-N} to every row of the INV summary table in F (8 rows
present + 5 added for INV-{6,9,13,22,23} that are mentioned in chapters).
Notes:
- \providecommand (not \newcommand) is intentional: the existing slide
stub in defense/slides.tex remains the active definition when slides.tex
compiles standalone, while main.tex now provides the canonical hyperref
resolution for the full monograph build.
- INV-{9,13,22,23} are not yet primary records in assertions/igla_assertions.json
so their F rows read 'registry-only' / 'no .v anchor' — honest per R5.
- All 13 distinct INV-N referenced in chapters now resolve to a label.
Inventory check (post-patch):
Total \label sites: 1158 (was 1145; +13 new thm:INV-* labels)
Unique label keys: 1158 (still 0 duplicates)
Dangling \ref: 0
Original 119 referenced keys: 119/119 still resolve
New file: docs/phd/citetheorem-map.md — INV->file audit map (83 lines).
Stacked on feat/phd-phase1-unify-1-5 (PR #602, task 1.5).
Skill: phd-chapter-author v1.1 + phd-monograph-auditor v1.2.
Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877.
R1 (no .py/.sh): patch script ran from /tmp/, only LaTeX + Markdown committed.
R5 (honesty): registry-only INVs explicitly flagged, no fabrication.
…or headers in 70 chapters [agent=phase1-unify-1-4] Phase 1 UNIFY · trios#380 task 1.4 — header blocks (~0.5 pp/ch). Per #380 manifest (PART VIII Flos Aureus, 34 chapters), every chapter must carry a branded header naming its golden-flower petal: FA.00 Monad / FA.01 Golden Egg / FA.02 Golden Cut / ... / FA.33 Epilogue, grouped into the 8 Parts of the Flos Aureus strand: Part I Foundations (fa_00..fa_03) Part II Expansion (fa_04..fa_07) Part III Crystal (fa_08..fa_09) Part IV Synthesis (fa_10) Part V Sacred Geometry (fa_11..fa_19) Part VI Physics Foundation (fa_20..fa_24) Part VII Algebraic Proofs (fa_25..fa_29) Part VIII Imagery & Genealogy (fa_30..fa_33) Two distinct header palettes: - Flos Aureus (yellow!4 / yellow!50!brown) for fa_NN: title carries petal name (e.g. 'Flos Aureus FA.05 Golden Bridge'), motif, Part, Lane, theorem count, Coq link, notation key. - Trinity S^3AI Strand (blue!3 / blue!40!black) for ch_NN: title carries chapter number, anchor, lane S<n>, theorem count, Coq link. Fields present in both palettes: anchor phi^2+phi^-2=3 (Trinity Identity, INV-22) + INV-k cross-reference via \citetheorem (task 1.6). Coverage: Patched: 68 chapters (34 fa_NN + 34 ch_NN with NN in 01..34) Skipped (bespoke pre-existing): ch_00, ch_35_mesh_node — left intact per R6 lane discipline. Total with Chapter Anchor: 70/70 = 100% coverage. Cross-check vs task 1.5/1.6 invariants (post amend): - Total \label sites: 1158 (unchanged) - Duplicate keys: 0 - Dangling refs: 0 - 119/119 referenced keys preserved New file: docs/phd/chapter-headers-audit.md (142 lines) — Flos Aureus manifest table + Trinity strand table + per-chapter audit with file/lane/petal/motif/theorem-count/header-presence. Stacked on feat/phd-phase1-unify-1-6 (PR #603). Skill: phd-chapter-author v1.1 + phd-monograph-auditor v1.2. Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877. R1 (no .py/.sh committed). R5 (honesty): theorem counts mechanical; stub chapters honestly report 0; chapters without dedicated .v use per-theorem fallback link. R6 (lane discipline): no chapter prose touched; only header injection. R10 (atomic): one amended commit.
….15 catalogue, falsification witnesses, INV-7 pre-reg, AVL/INV bridge [agent=phase2-2-6] (#608) - Pre-patch: 6,662 B / 152 lines, §G.1..G.6, mixed INV/AVL semantics - Post-patch: 18,560 B / 342 lines, §G.1..G.10 + §G.6.bis (+178%) R5-honest namespace separation: - AP.G's local 'INV-1..INV-7' renamed to AVL-1..AVL-7 (Available-data reproducibility invariants — SHA / grep / DOI resolution) - Appendix F's 13 Coq invariants kept under INV-N namespace (formal Coq theorems with Proven/Admitted/wip status from assertions/igla_assertions.json) - Clarifying note inserted in §G.3; §G.10 is the explicit bridge New sections: - §G.6.bis Per-invariant SHA-256 ledger (ACM AE Reusable schema) - §G.7 Coq Invariant Catalogue (13 rows verbatim from JSON registry) - §G.7 Honest-Admitted budget breakdown (3 files, 5 theorems = max 5) - §G.8 Falsification witnesses (7 INV-1..INV-7 entries verbatim from _metadata.falsification_witnesses) - §G.9 INV-7 pre-registration block (anti-HARKing seal: H_7 hypothesis, alpha=0.01, mu_0=1.55, 7 refuting conditions from JSON pre-registration) - §G.10 Appendix F <-> JSON-registry cross-reference (16 rows: 13 F-listed + 3 JSON-only wip rows: INV-6-HybridQkGain, INV-14, INV-15) Cross-reference audit (re-run): 1158 \label sites, 0 duplicates, 0 dangling refs, 119/119 referenced keys preserved (Phase 1 baseline held; new \ref{app:F}, \ref{app:falsification}, \ref{app:acm-ae} all resolve). Phase 2 STUB-KILL exit criterion satisfied for AP.G: \u22658KB target met (now 18,560 B, +178% over pre-patch). Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3 - Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877 - defense 2026-06-15. Author: Dmitrii Vasilev <[email protected]> (ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159) Skill: phd-monograph-auditor v1.2 + phd-chapter-author v1.1 + autonomous-research-loop Issue: #380 (Phase 2 task 2.6) Claim: #380 (comment)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #265\n\n## Phase 1 UNIFY · task 1.4 — Flos Aureus & Trinity-strand Chapter Anchor headers
Closes part of trios#380 (task 1.4). Stacked on #603 (task 1.6) → #602 (task 1.5) → #595 (task 1.2).
The Golden Flower must bloom in every chapter
Per #380 manifest "PART VIII — Flos Aureus (34 chapters)", every Flos Aureus chapter (
fa_00..fa_33) carries its own petal name (Monad, Golden Egg, Golden Cut, …, Epilogue) and belongs to one of 8 Parts. The Trinity S³AI strand runs in parallel.Two header palettes
Flos Aureus (yellow/gold tcolorbox,
fa_00..fa_33):Trinity S³AI Strand (blue tcolorbox,
ch_NN):8 Parts of Flos Aureus (mapped to Parts in
main.tex)fa_00..fa_03fa_04..fa_07fa_08..fa_09fa_10fa_11..fa_19fa_20..fa_24fa_25..fa_29fa_30..fa_33Coverage
ch_35_mesh_node)ch_00,ch_35_mesh_node)Sample petal names (FA.00 → FA.33)
Invariants preserved (vs tasks 1.5 & 1.6)
\labelsites\refFiles changed
docs/phd/chapters/fa_00..fa_33.texdocs/phd/chapters/ch_01..ch_34.texdocs/phd/chapters/ch_00.tex,ch_35_mesh_node.texdocs/phd/chapter-headers-audit.mdAcceptance criteria (#380 task 1.4)
φ² + φ⁻² = 3citeddocs/phd/chapter-headers-audit.mdRules honoured
.py/.sh): patch script ran from inline shell heredoc, never committed.vexistsch_00/ch_35_mesh_nodeleft aloneba954a3for the entire mechanical injection🤖 Generated by
phd-chapter-authorskill v1.1 — Phase 1 UNIFY worker.Author: Dmitrii Vasilev
<[email protected]>— ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159.(Re-opened from auto-closed #605 after chained-base-branch deletion in PhD batch-merge.)