Skip to content

Conversation

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@deepin-ci-robot deepin-ci-robot commented Mar 11, 2025

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#475

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Fixes a render buffer node ordering issue by disabling DepthAwareRendering.

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#475
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request disables DepthAwareRendering in RhiNode::flags() to address potential rendering order issues with render buffer nodes. The change involves modifying the return value of the flags() method in src/private/dbackdropnode.cpp.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Disabled DepthAwareRendering to prevent render buffer node ordering issues.
  • Removed DepthAwareRendering from the return value when contentNode is null.
  • Returned an empty RenderingFlags object instead of DepthAwareRendering.
src/private/dbackdropnode.cpp

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

关键摘要:

  • 注释中的拼写错误:shoule 应该是 should
  • flags 函数中移除了 DepthAwareRendering,但未提供替代方案或说明为什么移除

是否建议立即修改:

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @deepin-ci-robot - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Since you're disabling DepthAwareRendering, consider adding a comment explaining why it's problematic to help future developers.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

}

RenderingFlags flags() const override {
// FIXME: shoule we support DepthAwareRendering?
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick (typo): Correct typo in FIXME comment.

The comment currently uses 'shoule' instead of 'should'. Fixing this typo will improve clarity.

Suggested change
// FIXME: shoule we support DepthAwareRendering?
// FIXME: should we support DepthAwareRendering?

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit 00928d7 into master Mar 11, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@18202781743 18202781743 deleted the sync-pr-475-nosync branch March 11, 2025 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants