Skip to content

Conversation

@18202781743
Copy link
Contributor

@18202781743 18202781743 commented Mar 11, 2025

Disable DepthAwareRendering to ensure the uniform render order as
element order.

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Fixes a bug where render buffer nodes could be rendered in the wrong order when DepthAwareRendering is enabled.

Disable DepthAwareRendering to ensure the uniform render order as
element order.
@18202781743 18202781743 requested review from BLumia and mhduiy March 11, 2025 04:03
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request disables DepthAwareRendering for backdrop nodes to ensure a consistent render order based on element order. This change addresses a potential issue where enabling DepthAwareRendering could lead to incorrect rendering order for render buffer nodes.

Updated class diagram for RhiNode

classDiagram
  class RhiNode {
    -RenderingFlags flags()
  }
  RhiNode : -DepthAwareRendering
  RhiNode : +BoundedRectRendering
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Disabled DepthAwareRendering for backdrop nodes.
  • Modified the flags() method in RhiNode to return BoundedRectRendering instead of DepthAwareRendering when contentNode is null.
  • Modified the flags() method in RhiNode to return an empty RenderingFlags object instead of DepthAwareRendering when contentNode is not null.
src/private/dbackdropnode.cpp

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin pr auto review

关键摘要:

  • 注释中的拼写错误:shoule 应该是 should
  • flags 函数中移除了 DepthAwareRendering,但未提供替代方案或说明为什么移除

是否建议立即修改:

deepin-ci-robot added a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#475
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @18202781743 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider adding a test case that specifically targets the rendering order issue you're addressing.
  • The FIXME suggests uncertainty about DepthAwareRendering; clarify whether it should be re-enabled in the future or removed entirely.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

}

RenderingFlags flags() const override {
// FIXME: shoule we support DepthAwareRendering?
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick (typo): Correct typo in FIXME comment.

There's a typo in the comment ('shoule' should be 'should'). Although it's a minor issue, updating this will help clarity.

Suggested change
// FIXME: shoule we support DepthAwareRendering?
// FIXME: should we support DepthAwareRendering?

@mhduiy
Copy link
Contributor

mhduiy commented Mar 11, 2025

/approve

@mhduiy
Copy link
Contributor

mhduiy commented Mar 11, 2025

/approve cancel

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit a55b742 into linuxdeepin:master Mar 11, 2025
17 of 21 checks passed
18202781743 pushed a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#475
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants