Skip to content

DOC-1391: Add link to Active-Active application failover page in Auto… #1615

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mich-elle-luna
Copy link
Collaborator

… Tiering index

@mich-elle-luna mich-elle-luna requested a review from rrelledge May 23, 2025 17:12
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Collaborator

@rrelledge rrelledge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left a few comments/suggestions.

@@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ On-premises environments support more deployment options than other environments
- [Time series]({{< relref "/operate/oss_and_stack/stack-with-enterprise/timeseries" >}})
- [Probabilistic data structures]({{< relref "/operate/oss_and_stack/stack-with-enterprise/bloom" >}})

For more information about application failover with Active-Active databases, see [Application failover with Active-Active databases]({{< relref "/operate/rs/databases/active-active/develop/app-failover-active-active.md" >}}).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This statement feels a bit sudden and out-of-place since this section isn't related to app failover and the linked application failover article doesn't really have anything to do with auto tiering specifically. The original ticket also doesn't mention failover as far as I can tell. I think maybe it would be better to just add a link to the A-A landing page from the following note instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants