Skip to content

Conversation

@guyf-starkware
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@reviewable-StarkWare
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor Author

guyf-starkware commented Oct 27, 2025

Copy link
Contributor Author

@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 4 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @ShahakShama)


scripts/prod/update_config_and_restart_nodes_lib.py line 600 at r1 (raw file):

    for index, config in enumerate(configs):
        print(f"Applying config {index}...")
        # apply_configmap(

This is left commented out while in review to make sure we don't accidentally do something. Adding this blocking comment to avoid accidental merge with this still commented out


scripts/prod/update_config_and_restart_nodes_lib.py line 609 at r1 (raw file):

    if restart_strategy != RestartStrategy.NO_RESTART:
        for index, config in enumerate(configs):
            # restart_pod(

This is left commented out while in review to make sure we don't accidentally do something. Adding this blocking comment to avoid accidental merge with this still commented out

@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-27-scripts_add_an_abstraction_for_the_args_that_depend_on_each_other_and_validate_them_in_one_place branch from 35fa0cc to 34281ad Compare October 28, 2025 11:07
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware changed the base branch from main-v0.14.1 to graphite-base/9797 October 28, 2025 11:30
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-27-scripts_add_an_abstraction_for_the_args_that_depend_on_each_other_and_validate_them_in_one_place branch from 34281ad to 578e5b4 Compare October 28, 2025 11:30
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware changed the base branch from graphite-base/9797 to 10-28-scripts_fix_a_bug_where_the_get_pod_names_did_not_use_the_namespace_and_context_from_args October 28, 2025 11:30
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-28-scripts_fix_a_bug_where_the_get_pod_names_did_not_use_the_namespace_and_context_from_args branch from 6828d34 to f1a3b8b Compare October 28, 2025 13:13
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-27-scripts_add_an_abstraction_for_the_args_that_depend_on_each_other_and_validate_them_in_one_place branch from 578e5b4 to 86d3ec4 Compare October 28, 2025 13:13
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-27-scripts_add_an_abstraction_for_the_args_that_depend_on_each_other_and_validate_them_in_one_place branch from 86d3ec4 to c180da2 Compare October 30, 2025 11:27
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-28-scripts_fix_a_bug_where_the_get_pod_names_did_not_use_the_namespace_and_context_from_args branch from f1a3b8b to 2fc24e1 Compare October 30, 2025 11:37
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-27-scripts_add_an_abstraction_for_the_args_that_depend_on_each_other_and_validate_them_in_one_place branch from c180da2 to 04be961 Compare October 30, 2025 11:37
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-27-scripts_add_an_abstraction_for_the_args_that_depend_on_each_other_and_validate_them_in_one_place branch from 04be961 to 8277b17 Compare October 30, 2025 15:09
Copy link
Collaborator

@ShahakShama ShahakShama left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ShahakShama reviewed 2 of 4 files at r1, 2 of 2 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @guyf-starkware)


scripts/prod/update_config_and_restart_nodes_lib.py line 600 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, guyf-starkware wrote…

This is left commented out while in review to make sure we don't accidentally do something. Adding this blocking comment to avoid accidental merge with this still commented out

Just making sure, you mean you'll uncomment this before merging (and not delete this), right?


scripts/prod/update_config_and_restart_nodes_lib.py line 609 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, guyf-starkware wrote…

This is left commented out while in review to make sure we don't accidentally do something. Adding this blocking comment to avoid accidental merge with this still commented out

Just making sure, you mean you'll uncomment this before merging (and not delete this), right?Just making sure, you mean you'll uncomment this before merging (and not delete this), right?


scripts/prod/update_config_and_restart_nodes_lib.py line 512 at r2 (raw file):

    def get_cluster(self, index: int) -> Optional[str]:
        return self.cluster_list[index] if self.cluster_list else None

Our python conventions is to write explicitly if x is not None and not if x

@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-27-scripts_add_an_abstraction_for_the_args_that_depend_on_each_other_and_validate_them_in_one_place branch from 8277b17 to b1f2a45 Compare November 2, 2025 09:34
Copy link
Contributor Author

@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 3 of 4 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @ShahakShama)


scripts/prod/update_config_and_restart_nodes_lib.py line 600 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, ShahakShama wrote…

Just making sure, you mean you'll uncomment this before merging (and not delete this), right?

Yes. I made this blocking comment to make sure I don't mege by mistake before resolving the comment (and uncomment the code)


scripts/prod/update_config_and_restart_nodes_lib.py line 609 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, ShahakShama wrote…

Just making sure, you mean you'll uncomment this before merging (and not delete this), right?Just making sure, you mean you'll uncomment this before merging (and not delete this), right?

Same as above


scripts/prod/update_config_and_restart_nodes_lib.py line 512 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, ShahakShama wrote…

Our python conventions is to write explicitly if x is not None and not if x

Done

@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware changed the base branch from 10-28-scripts_fix_a_bug_where_the_get_pod_names_did_not_use_the_namespace_and_context_from_args to graphite-base/9797 November 2, 2025 09:47
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware force-pushed the 10-27-scripts_add_an_abstraction_for_the_args_that_depend_on_each_other_and_validate_them_in_one_place branch from b1f2a45 to 64f76e2 Compare November 2, 2025 09:47
@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware changed the base branch from graphite-base/9797 to main-v0.14.1 November 2, 2025 09:47
Copy link
Contributor Author

@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@guyf-starkware reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed (commit messages unreviewed), all discussions resolved (waiting on @guyf-starkware)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@guyf-starkware reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @guyf-starkware)

@guyf-starkware guyf-starkware added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 2, 2025
Merged via the queue into main-v0.14.1 with commit a4f1df4 Nov 2, 2025
18 of 26 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants