Skip to content

[WIP] Allow users to include other configuration files. #1426

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

troessner
Copy link
Owner

Fixes part 2 of #1411

@troessner troessner force-pushed the allow-users-to-include-other-configuration-files branch from 1292eb9 to 294e59d Compare October 10, 2018 19:34
@troessner
Copy link
Owner Author

@mvz should we allow deep nesting of inclusion? wdyt?


Scenario: Other configuration file does not exist

Scenario: Other configuration file contains a syntax error
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can handle the error cases in specs instead?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed ;)

@mvz
Copy link
Collaborator

mvz commented Oct 11, 2018

should we allow deep nesting of inclusion? wdyt?

Yes, I think we should probably allow it, unless it makes things more complicated.

@troessner
Copy link
Owner Author

Yes, I think we should probably allow it, unless it makes things more complicated.

Yeah, I'm just gonna start out and see where it goes ;)

@troessner
Copy link
Owner Author

Stale, closing for now.

@troessner troessner closed this Jan 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants