fix(rivetkit): repair setupDatabase merge after restack#4243
fix(rivetkit): repair setupDatabase merge after restack#4243NathanFlurry wants to merge 1 commit intographite-base/4243from
Conversation
|
🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-4243 environment in rivet-frontend
|
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue. You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
a6c938a to
b0dcd83
Compare
PR Review: fix(rivetkit): repair setupDatabase merge after restackThis PR fixes a malformed What was broken in the originalThe original code had several structural defects from the merge conflict:
The fixThe new code is correct and clean:
Minor observationThe VerdictThis is a straightforward correctness fix for a merge artifact. The refactored code is functionally equivalent to the intended pre-restack logic and is more readable. No concerns. |
PR Review: fix(rivetkit): repair setupDatabase merge after restackSummary: This PR fixes broken indentation and structure in Code QualityThe refactor is clean and correct: Early return pattern — replacing the outer De Morgan's law check — the guard inversion is correct:
These are logically equivalent. ✓ Catch block logic — the two-path error handler (rethrow Minor Observations
VerdictThe fix correctly repairs the malformed structure from the merge. No logical changes, no new issues introduced. LGTM once out of draft. |
Merge activity
|
# Description Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context.
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.
Checklist: